"Thank you. Ahhh, Juicy Fruit."I hope there are so many lawsuits that Frosh and OweMalley have to check into a mental health facility.
"Nurse Ratchett I want my cigarettes!!!!!!"
Check being dropped off at Lou's this afternoon.
"Thank you. Ahhh, Juicy Fruit."I hope there are so many lawsuits that Frosh and OweMalley have to check into a mental health facility.
"Nurse Ratchett I want my cigarettes!!!!!!"
Looks to be just the facts, as opposed to the extreme left slant we have come to expect from this paper. Surely they have not changed there views in the topic, but the tune in the articles they have!
Seriously? Did you NOT read the AGC press release or notice that the MD State Rifle and Pistol Association (the state NRA arm) is a party to the suit?
I'm sick of this misnomer around our state these days. The NRA has proven they are in this for us starting with the legislative session. They may have neglected our state for many years and we may have to "trust" but "verify" them for the foreseeable future, but enough is enough.
To anyone knocking the NRA right now, you're going to get a shovel of wisdom from me when I see it.
/rant
Precisely.Not to mention, NRA will file suit AFTER the law goes into effect. It will cost millions. It's not like there can only be one lawsuit. This isn't a football game where the next play is coming in a minute or two. Patience is needed.
Reading lawsuit now... can't really see how much counts 1-3 will survive...(IMNSHO count 2 could have been a copy/paste job from when the 20+ round mags got banned) but... count 4 is where things got interesting - that's where the vagueness of the whitelist/blacklist is attacked.
"Strict scrutiny" may be what wins it, though. The law was to prevent gun violence, and... well, if the statistics can be backed up, long guns aren't used in violence much.
I hope something good comes out of it, but I expect most of it to get thrown out, with lots of "but California does it!" thrown in with the salt just because the administration hates us.
I am assuming there will be at least one more lawsuit over HQL / handguns.
I thought the Plantiffs were not supposed to be personally named(except for the organizations) due to security possibilities. Or was that the other one. So much to keep track of these days.
Thank you and good luck. Donation to follow in the very near future. Just trying to figure out which group would benefit the most when pushing this forward.
no mention of the, and I quote the AG letter, "never challenged" "assault pistol" ban?
seems a good fit, with the ada angle, and pre ban owners
So what has our NRA dollars gotten us Marylanders? - nothing that I can see. Even after the president of NRA, who lives in Md, said they would file law suit - right!
MSI is where our dollars should go
I believe that it also helps our position that they are not in the fore front. No need to detract from the fact that this is a MD battle.
Speaking just for myself, I was told this would not be a John Doe filing and my name would be released. Nothing to fear in this as its the right thing to do and isnt that the reason I own firearms? To protect myself and those in my home.
Agreed. The NRA suit will not be filed until after Oct 1, when the plaintiffs will have standing. No one is harmed by a law that isn't in effect yet. Perhaps more reading of the various threads on this topic will answer questions before they are posed repeatedly.