- Nov 11, 2009
- 31,024
I can't deny that that played a part in my decision as well.Had you said “looks cool” I would have also agreed.
Wood beats rubber; make of that what you will.
I can't deny that that played a part in my decision as well.Had you said “looks cool” I would have also agreed.
How do you like the Rami for carry? I've got a huge soft soft spot for DA/SAs.CZ Rami, Urban Carry pancake, rt hand 4o'clock. (Selfie reverses image?).
I've been wearing it all day every day since I got the permit. No one notices it, seemingly, though now it's a bit chilly I wear a light jacket. I have an IWB holster coming, hopefully will prove a little more discreet. (We'll have to wait and see what surprises the MD GA will bring to bear. Might as well have the option available).
I took Ed Shell's comment about wood grips not binding on clothing into account; made sense to me.
How do you like the Rami for carry? I've got a huge soft soft spot for DA/SAs.
Me too! 8001 Connecticut AveI live and work in Bethesda/Chevy Chase so...
99 and 44/100% I do. Even in the summer.
That's what it's about!
How you like that lcp max mine shoots so low with multiple shooters ruger sent me new barrel and slide but now rds won't exject not happy with itHere is my normal EDC…
Ruger LCP Max with 12 round magazine, kydex front pocket holster off eBay, Lighting Elite OTF, Citizen Eco-drive, cheap Amazon wallet.
I’ve been carrying concealed for over 15 years including here in MD. Also carry a full size for work. I prefer pocket carry for when it’s warm out. Have a 43X I might put into the rotation when it gets colder, but the comfort of pocket carrying the LCP is so hard to beat.
Mine shoots low too. Haven’t had enough range time to figure out if it is me, the ammo or the sights.How you like that lcp max mine shoots so low with multiple shooters ruger sent me new barrel and slide but now rds won't exject not happy with it
Ruger dropped the ball on this one I love ruger but this firearm is crappy going to sell it if ruger doesn't refund me which they said they would have to have the firearm sent it to check it out which I told them nothing to check out just gonna waste time so looks like I'm going to lose it on a $150-200 maybe want either a g26 or a sig p365 380 to stay with 380acpMine shoots low too. Haven’t had enough range time to figure out if it is me, the ammo or the sights.
How you like that lcp max mine shoots so low with multiple shooters ruger sent me new barrel and slide but now rds won't exject not happy with it
Mine shoots low too. Haven’t had enough range time to figure out if it is me, the ammo or the sights.
Tried poa hold 6 o clock 12 o clock doesn't matter still shoots low different ammo I went tru 640 rds of different ammo trying to see which one shoots poa pmc 95gr fmj is the closest I was planning on running underwood 68gr extreme defender but it throws them all over far left low left different shooters same resultsWhat hold are you using on the sights? Mine does not seem that low when using a combat hold vice 6 o'clock.
I have tried different holds. So far just range ammo.What hold are you using on the sights? Mine does not seem that low when using a combat hold vice 6 o'clock.
Good luck hope it works out for you...I shoulda got the original lcp as they shoot decent better then the lcp max but the capacity is what sold meI have tried different holds. So far just range ammo.
If you're shooting low with the Ruger, you're going to shoot low with the SIG, too. Because both of them expect you to totally cover your POI with the sights. "Combat" sight picture, not the ol' lollipop/six-o'clock. Of course, at the distances a tiny 380 is intended to be used, it truly doesn't matter. In real life, you're going to be point shooting anyway, not lining up for a tiny little group on paper. Those are "get me outa here!" guns, not bullseye guns.... or a sig p365 380 to stay with 380acp
I have all of my handguns setup for combat hold. I think my issue is probably my grip with such a small gun rather than a problem with the gun itself. The trigger is much better than the original LCP.If you're shooting low with the Ruger, you're going to shoot low with the SIG, too. Because both of them expect you to totally cover your POI with the sights. "Combat" sight picture, not the ol' lollipop/six-o'clock. Of course, at the distances a tiny 380 is intended to be used, it truly doesn't matter. In real life, you're going to be point shooting anyway, not lining up for a tiny little group on paper. Those are "get me outa here!" guns, not bullseye guns.
I'm a long-time six-o'clock hold guy, and got grumpy with the P365 (which I happily now carry) because I just wasn't used to hiding my target behind the sights. Then, instead of testing myself (and it) against a two-inch orange sticker or the X ring on paper, I started putting up full size torso targets and shooting like I meant it in a self defense manner. Plenty of holes right where you need them in a make-the-threat-go-away capacity. A couple inches low, in that context, if you don't map your sight picture to the pistol's design, is neither here nor there.
For the Ruger, then, it comes down to how it handles, do you like the physical size, etc. The SIG is going to be notably larger. I have an LCP2 I'll pocket carry, but I won't pocket carry the SIG - it's just over the line (unless it's a big coat pocket or such). Work on your sight picture/covering before you throw that Ruger baby out with the bath water.
Good points just don't know if I'm going to continue to try I could put that money in ammo and train with a different firearm and become more proficient thanks for the reply thoIf you're shooting low with the Ruger, you're going to shoot low with the SIG, too. Because both of them expect you to totally cover your POI with the sights. "Combat" sight picture, not the ol' lollipop/six-o'clock. Of course, at the distances a tiny 380 is intended to be used, it truly doesn't matter. In real life, you're going to be point shooting anyway, not lining up for a tiny little group on paper. Those are "get me outa here!" guns, not bullseye guns.
I'm a long-time six-o'clock hold guy, and got grumpy with the P365 (which I happily now carry) because I just wasn't used to hiding my target behind the sights. Then, instead of testing myself (and it) against a two-inch orange sticker or the X ring on paper, I started putting up full size torso targets and shooting like I meant it in a self defense manner. Plenty of holes right where you need them in a make-the-threat-go-away capacity. A couple inches low, in that context, if you don't map your sight picture to the pistol's design, is neither here nor there.
For the Ruger, then, it comes down to how it handles, do you like the physical size, etc. The SIG is going to be notably larger. I have an LCP2 I'll pocket carry, but I won't pocket carry the SIG - it's just over the line (unless it's a big coat pocket or such). Work on your sight picture/covering before you throw that Ruger baby out with the bath water.
This might sound stupid, but do you shoot it better one handed?I have all of my handguns setup for combat hold. I think my issue is probably my grip with such a small gun rather than a problem with the gun itself. The trigger is much better than the original LCP.
I've likewise found that these tiny guns with virtually no mass will hugely amplify a trigger-pull dive or wiggle that you'd be less likely to ever notice in a longer/heavier frame. If your trigger pull isn't a perfectly in-place squeeze that doesn't introduce a push or a twist, these no-mass guns will definitely spank you for it.I have all of my handguns setup for combat hold. I think my issue is probably my grip with such a small gun rather than a problem with the gun itself. The trigger is much better than the original LCP.