Carralero vs Bonta : Cali anti bruen case : FED judge issues PI

[delaware_export]

Details are still coming but FPC has the article listed so… good news. Surely appeal in 5..4..3.. which places are in the ruling. Haven’t read all yet… prolly wait for lawyer translation...

new link direct to fpc. the others disappeared...

FPC WIN: Federal Judge Blocks California’s SB2 Handgun Carry Bans

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that Federal District Judge Cormac J. Carney issued a preliminary injunction in its Carralero v. Bonta lawsuit, blocking enforcement of California’s newest ban on firearm carry.

www.firearmspolicy.org

 

[Muleskinner]

error on the link

 

[delaware_export]

Worked for me, but tried more direct link. Seems visible in post

 

[Stoveman]

Waldostreicher weeps, Angrier Shamblee will be found tomorrow in a dried pool of her own vomit, next to an empty box of Cardboardeaux.

 

[Stoveman]

OP, you should post this in the national 2A forum, this one is reserved for the discussion of rice cookers, Epstein's client list and fighting about Norton's next truck purchase.

For God's sake man, have some respect.

 

[RoadDawg]

OP, you should post this in the national 2A forum, this one is reserved for the discussion of rice cookers, Epstein's client list and fighting about Norton's next truck purchase.

For God's sake man, have some respect.

 

[rbird7282]

Waldostreicher weeps, Angrier Shamblee will be found tomorrow in a dried pool of her own vomit, next to an empty box of Cardboardeaux.

Lmfao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Stoveman]

 

[Doctor_M]

Gavin can EABOD.

 

[Boats]

Somebody needs to spend his time studying some basic constitutional law instead of cupping the CCP's balls

 

[Inigoes]

Somebody needs to spend his time studying some basic constitutional law instead of cupping the CCP's balls

That is the problem, they are looking for the enshrined right that doesn't exist in the US constitution: "Safety"

The only place "safe" is mentioned is Article I, Section 9, paragraph 2 is to restrict government's power:

"The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

The Anti's are trying a twist a single word into something completely different.

 

[swinokur]

The 2A is my right to safety.

Gov. Newscum needs to read the COTUS.

 

[Boats]

The Anti's are trying a twist a single word into something completely different.

Agree. "safe" is a misused buzzword of the snowflake woke agenda, along with racist, abusive, equity, privilege, deserve, appropriation etc.

Usually used to absolve to person who says it of any responsibility for their words, actions, or feelings.

 

[swinokur]

 

[Occam]

But ... but ... "California's data-backed gun safety efforts!"

I feel confident that Democrats in their own way also once claimed they had data-backed evidence that the southern economy just plain worked better when Democrats could own slaves, and that calling the practice repugnant was like calling the Democrats' enshrined safety of having someone you own harvest your food for you repugnant, dammit. Silly principles like liberty and whatnot should NEVER be more important than data. Come ON, man!

 

[swinokur]

JUDGE ISSUES PRELIM. INJUNCTION AGAINST CA ‘SENSITIVE PLACES’ LAW​

BELLEVUE, WA – Noting that California’s “sensitive places” law severely restricting lawful concealed carry is “sweeping, repugnant to the Second Amendment, and openly defiant of the Supreme Court,” a federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the law’s enforcement.



It is a major victory for the Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in a federal lawsuit filed in September. The case is known as May v. Bonta. Sharing the victory are Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of California, the California Rifle & Pistol Association and eleven private citizens. They are represented by attorneys C.D. Michel, Sean A. Brady and Konstadinos T. Moros at Michel & Associates in Long Beach, and Donald Kilmer, Law Offices of Don Kilmer, Caldwell, Idaho.



U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney at the Central District of California handed down his 43-page decision Wednesday. In his ruling, the judge noted, “The right to self-defense and to defend one’s family is fundamental and inherent to our very humanity irrespective of any formal codification…For many years, the right to bear arms, and so necessarily the right to self-defense, was relegated to second-class status.” That all changed when the U.S. Supreme Court handed down three landmark rulings over the course of 14 years, ending with the June 2022 Bruen decision.



But California lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom essentially ignored the high court, and as Judge Carney noted, defied the rulings on Second Amendment rights. Senate Bill 2, designating virtually all private property open to the public as “sensitive places” was adopted.



“SB2 is not only an affront to the right to keep and bear arms,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “it’s an insult to the intelligence of every honest citizen in the Golden State. It amounts to a massive prohibition on legal carry throughout the state, which runs counter to what the U.S. Supreme Court said in its Bruen ruling last year. Thankfully, Judge Carney sent a message to Gov. Newsom and anti-gun-rights state lawmakers that they can’t get away with this.”



SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut added, “SB 2 is deliberately designed to frustrate and ultimately discourage individuals from exercising their right to bear arms by creating a patchwork of locations where Second Amendment rights may, or may not, be exercised. We’re delighted that Judge Carney saw through this sham.”

 

[pcfixer]

 

[Steel Hunter]

Link to the preliminary injunction: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67829706/42/carralero-v-bonta/

 

[Stoveman]

The FPC is freaking savage.

 

[Occam]

The FPC is freaking savage.

I definitely laughed a little too hard at that. Thanks.