CA4 Issues Stay, Expedites Appeal

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • brad20670

    Member
    Jun 8, 2012
    17
    :party29: Agreed It was allowed when we sent ours in...

    What are the damages due to those who applied and were denied when the G&S reason is found unconstitutional? Does the state just get away with it or is there a penalty to be paid? Can I lock up someone in my basement for years, then have a court tell me I am wrong and walk away? NO! This is complete bullsh*t. Is this our system? Yes. Is it fair? NO!
     

    Patrick

    MSI Executive Member
    Apr 26, 2009
    7,725
    Calvert County
    OK, this sucks. It was always a possibility.

    MSP is not sure what they are going to do with these apps, but they might come back and ask you for G&S and then deny if you cannot provide. This would be decided by the brass. Trust me when I say maintaining those apps is our #1 priority right now. More later.

    Also, the application clinics are off right now. We've been working the special session and our latest indication is nothing 2A related is going to come up - Miller wants a clean slate and it is recognized that anything anti-2A would gum up the works. And trust me when I say we would gum it up bad.

    More later.
     

    jonnyl

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 23, 2009
    5,969
    Frederick
    So, as much as people complain about "slow" - "fast" doesn't seem to be so hot...

    Anyway, now that I'm starting to get over the initial shock, I don't think this is a bad sign. No matter how obvious "shall not be infringed" is to us, to much of the rest of the country it's a balancing act. I think Gura was 100% right that the SCOTUS left signposts that 2A extends outside the home, and that there is equality between "keep" and "bear".

    But forcing a state to start giving out permits while waiting on an upcoming appeal would be a pretty big effing deal.

    They clearly didn't make their decision based on the 4 part test, but whether we call it a "punt" or say "they didn't do their job" may be an over simplification.

    I think it much more likely that they said, "hey, this is a pretty important case let's not screw around so we'll expedite it, but in the mean time let's just keep things as they are for a couple months"

    I don't agree with the decision, and don't like it at all. But, I'm not ready to claim that three Federal Judges just tossed it aside with utter disregard for us peasants.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408

    General McAuliffe uttered his famous one word response: “Nuts!” When the German negotiator asked for a clarification, not understanding what the word meant, the American offered a more blunt translation: “Go to hell!”
     

    Merlin

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 31, 2009
    3,953
    Carroll County, Maryland
    So, as much as people complain about "slow" - "fast" doesn't seem to be so hot...

    Anyway, now that I'm starting to get over the initial shock, I don't think this is a bad sign. No matter how obvious "shall not be infringed" is to us, to much of the rest of the country it's a balancing act. I think Gura was 100% right that the SCOTUS left signposts that 2A extends outside the home, and that there is equality between "keep" and "bear".

    But forcing a state to start giving out permits while waiting on an upcoming appeal would be a pretty big effing deal.

    They clearly didn't make their decision based on the 4 part test, but whether we call it a "punt" or say "they didn't do their job" may be an over simplification.

    I think it much more likely that they said, "hey, this is a pretty important case let's not screw around so we'll expedite it, but in the mean time let's just keep things as they are for a couple months"

    I don't agree with the decision, and don't like it at all. But, I'm not ready to claim that three Federal Judges just tossed it aside with utter disregard for us peasants.

    It can't be considered a good sign.
     

    dlmcbm

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 5, 2011
    1,207
    Sabillasville, Md.
    Also, the application clinics are off right now. We've been working the special session and our latest indication is nothing 2A related is going to come up - Miller wants a clean slate and it is recognized that anything anti-2A would gum up the works. And trust me when I say we would gum it up bad.

    More later.

    Can we have a simple pro-2A come up that would clear all this mess?:D
     

    P-12 Norm

    Why be normal?
    Sep 9, 2009
    1,723
    Bowie, MD
    An expedited appeal is a big deal. It means you get to jump in front of the line for oral argument and for resolution. Highly unusual to get an oral argument date before all the briefs are filed. And yes, they can issue a one-line order like this. Not uncommon. By expediting it, they recognize the importance of the case and seek to minimize the length of time the stay pending appeal is in place.

    I read Gura's brief, and because they issued their own stay, doesn't that create an "injury" of some sort as he said, in regards to the average citizen and their rights? Even 90 days is 90 days with injury to our Constitutional Freedoms.

    Can we as citizens sue the 4th Circus?
    :mad54:
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    I read Gura's brief, and because they issued their own stay, doesn't that create an "injury" of some sort as he said, in regards to the average citizen and their rights? Even 90 days is 90 days with injury to our Constitutional Freedoms.

    Can we as citizens sue the 4th Circus?
    :mad54:

    No,
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,531
    Anyone still not believe that MSP's new *cooperation* wasn't a setup to give them political cover to dump 1,365 applications now ( Del Smiel's numbers) instead of having to wait any longer ?

    Meanwhile States motion doesn't even address the point needed for a Stay. All of their lame rehash of irrelevant whining is 100% blown out of the water. Yet the State prevails within hours. Can the Motion Panel even keep a strieght face ? Can the CA4 maintain an apearence of Judicial Intregrety ?
     

    eyesinpines

    Active Member
    Mar 4, 2011
    257
    Look, guys. This is cutting edge stuff and we are in the big leagues of civil rights litigation where things move slowly and where success is never guaranteed. The stay is disappointing for sure (I'm probably in the first 365 so I am definitely disappointed!), but the merits is what is important. The stay is small potatoes in comparison. Six months from now, NO ONE will care about this stay if we win in the CA4. Similarly, no one will care about the stay if we lose on the merits in the CA4. If the stay had not issued and we lost on the merits we would all be getting notices to return our revoked permits after a mere 6 months or so of having them. In less than 3 months we will have argument in the 4th Circuit, on a schedule established before the last brief was filed. That's fast, much faster than what poor Mr. Heller had to go through in DC. So buck up. I am planning on going to Richmond for the argument. This will be interesting.
    With great respect to you and your unchallenged expertise, it's clear to me that our hopes and expectations are little more than mental masturbation.
    I do believe that you [or maybe someone else] laid out the specific criteria that the state would have to meet in order to have the stay granted.
    Obviously none of that was considered, and none mattered one iota.

    This was solely a political decision made by lackies of the system placating the desire of the state. No other explanation is credible given the "super warp" speed and lack of explanation from the court.

    I feel like a kid trying to play a game but the ball and all the equipment is owned by a total ******* who wants his own way or he picks up his stuff.

    Sorry, we're on a fools errand....unless you're young enough to wait for the second coming!
    Someone once said you can't fight City Hall. In this instance that has proven to be the case. I know this is not a final outcome, however it sure gives a good indication of what that is most likely to be.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,062
    Messages
    7,306,684
    Members
    33,564
    Latest member
    bara4033

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom