the fact that they don't want you to have a permit
And who makes those calls? 100 State St Annapolis MD
the fact that they don't want you to have a permit
And who makes those calls? 100 State St Annapolis MD
What are the damages due to those who applied and were denied when the G&S reason is found unconstitutional? Does the state just get away with it or is there a penalty to be paid? Can I lock up someone in my basement for years, then have a court tell me I am wrong and walk away? NO! This is complete bullsh*t. Is this our system? Yes. Is it fair? NO!
Bats.balls
Maryland SUCKS SO BAD. What is wrong with this effing piece of shit state?
balls
So they don't have to justify why they granted a stay? They can just grant the stay and that's it?
So, as much as people complain about "slow" - "fast" doesn't seem to be so hot...
Anyway, now that I'm starting to get over the initial shock, I don't think this is a bad sign. No matter how obvious "shall not be infringed" is to us, to much of the rest of the country it's a balancing act. I think Gura was 100% right that the SCOTUS left signposts that 2A extends outside the home, and that there is equality between "keep" and "bear".
But forcing a state to start giving out permits while waiting on an upcoming appeal would be a pretty big effing deal.
They clearly didn't make their decision based on the 4 part test, but whether we call it a "punt" or say "they didn't do their job" may be an over simplification.
I think it much more likely that they said, "hey, this is a pretty important case let's not screw around so we'll expedite it, but in the mean time let's just keep things as they are for a couple months"
I don't agree with the decision, and don't like it at all. But, I'm not ready to claim that three Federal Judges just tossed it aside with utter disregard for us peasants.
Also, the application clinics are off right now. We've been working the special session and our latest indication is nothing 2A related is going to come up - Miller wants a clean slate and it is recognized that anything anti-2A would gum up the works. And trust me when I say we would gum it up bad.
More later.
An expedited appeal is a big deal. It means you get to jump in front of the line for oral argument and for resolution. Highly unusual to get an oral argument date before all the briefs are filed. And yes, they can issue a one-line order like this. Not uncommon. By expediting it, they recognize the importance of the case and seek to minimize the length of time the stay pending appeal is in place.
Son of a Biscuit!
So much for my birthday present.
Son of a Biscuit!
Son of a Biscuit!
I read Gura's brief, and because they issued their own stay, doesn't that create an "injury" of some sort as he said, in regards to the average citizen and their rights? Even 90 days is 90 days with injury to our Constitutional Freedoms.
Can we as citizens sue the 4th Circus?
With great respect to you and your unchallenged expertise, it's clear to me that our hopes and expectations are little more than mental masturbation.Look, guys. This is cutting edge stuff and we are in the big leagues of civil rights litigation where things move slowly and where success is never guaranteed. The stay is disappointing for sure (I'm probably in the first 365 so I am definitely disappointed!), but the merits is what is important. The stay is small potatoes in comparison. Six months from now, NO ONE will care about this stay if we win in the CA4. Similarly, no one will care about the stay if we lose on the merits in the CA4. If the stay had not issued and we lost on the merits we would all be getting notices to return our revoked permits after a mere 6 months or so of having them. In less than 3 months we will have argument in the 4th Circuit, on a schedule established before the last brief was filed. That's fast, much faster than what poor Mr. Heller had to go through in DC. So buck up. I am planning on going to Richmond for the argument. This will be interesting.