You guys would complain if Frosh raped you with non-organic lube.
I thought that's what Frosh and the rest of the MGA have already been doing for a long time.
You guys would complain if Frosh raped you with non-organic lube.
Are you saying you would not? .... Want to go camping?You guys would complain if Frosh raped you with non-organic lube.
Johnny E;
I know for a fact that email time stamping is a legally acceptable way of communicating and proven so in court rulings.
It doesn’t go back centuries of course but I also don’t need to sign with a quil for it be legally signed.
A large body of law, going back centuries, has evolved around mailed correspondence. You may wish to google "the mailbox rule" for a discussion.
You guys would complain if Frosh raped you with non-organic lube.
The same large body of law now exists around email communications. Time stamps, send and receive logs, and header information, as well as the content of the messages, can all be used evidentially in court...
The same large body of law now exists around email communications. Time stamps, send and receive logs, and header information, as well as the content of the messages, can all be used evidentially in court.
....
No it doesn’t,
I can’t understand why you are so intent on being argumentative.
What would hurt if you were to send it BOTH ways?
That's what I did.
I've sent one snail-mail two weeks ago, and one email.
BTW, this is another reason to own a machinegun.
"Yup officer, that was my legal machinegun... go call it in, I don't give a sh!t"
That's of course if someone just called it in based on sound... pew pew pew pew pew
Nope, Pony Express girl comes on Wednesdays though.Has anyone gotten their return receipt yet????
Has anyone gotten their return receipt yet????
Nope.
I'm certain it was round filed.
Mr. Hawkeye,
Thank you for your recent inquiry to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).
ATF's position regarding Maryland’s new law is posted on our public website in a Special Advisory issued by our Office of Public Affairs. We have included a hyperlink to the advisory for your convenience below.
https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/maryland-law-restricting-rapid-fire-trigger-activators
We trust this advisory clarifies ATF’s authority and your submission is therefore returned without action. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance by contacting us at (202)648-7190 or FIPB@atf.gov.
Regards,
L. Babbie | Firearms Enforcement Specialist
U.S. Department of Justice | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Firearms Industry Programs Branch
99 New York Avenue NE, Mail Stop 6.N-518
Washington, DC 20226
ATF_logo_sigBlock
To the extent that this electronic communication contains case-related information, it is only a summary or excerpt and is not intended to be a complete statement of facts or a formal report.
FWIW:
I got my "official" response from ATF from my emailed application form this morning:
I'd say that constitutes acceptable proof that I have applied and am now legal to continue owning any such devices until next October.
That's why I sent a copy of my application via email yesterday. If I never get my receipt from the USPS, I at least have my email from them that they received something from me.
How would the law see it if you have a USPS page saying that your letter had been delivered, but never received your return receipt from the USPS? Since there's nothing specifically from the ATF saying they received it, I don't know how that would work.
Just curious.