Responsible firearms ownership and usage begs for sobriety and clear-headedness (as do many other weighty responsibilities).As far as I’m concerned, drug use is not very helpful to firearms ownership regardless of how the substance is delivered.
Responsible firearms ownership and usage begs for sobriety and clear-headedness (as do many other weighty responsibilities).As far as I’m concerned, drug use is not very helpful to firearms ownership regardless of how the substance is delivered.
I've been saying for years, whether medicinally or recreational the states allowing use of MJ is a back door to gun control..... I turned down a sale at the last Timonium show because the individual reeked of MJ, he wasn't happy but oh well.....
Responsible firearms ownership and usage begs for sobriety and clear-headedness (as do many other weighty responsibilities).
Same as it ever was.
good for youI've been saying for years, whether medicinally or recreational the states allowing use of MJ is a back door to gun control..... I turned down a sale at the last Timonium show because the individual reeked of MJ, he wasn't happy but oh well.....
True, but big difference between a good practice vs a government that will kick in doors and put someone in a cage over it.Responsible firearms ownership and usage begs for sobriety and clear-headedness (as do many other weighty responsibilities).
LOL, think I'm too sober to understand this.That’s right but it doesn't beg it, it requires it.
That way you don’t wind up doing stupid shit like shooting at the wrong target like some tires, harming yourself or other person like maybe in their own house reaching for tradesman tool or something like that.
Or maybe even putting a crossbow to your chin and loosing a bolt into your cranium because you lost that right by being a stoner/ lush like my neighbor did the other day.
Talk about a blood trail. Whoosh.
Rage / Servpro gangbang.
But hey, maybe half smoked up on some kw’s or sloughing g one off from the night before is a better excuse for doing stupid things than just being plain stupid.
Most people don’t need too much help and I could see being ripped as a better way to explain how dumb one may be vs. the former.
You didn’t read the part where I mentioned that men are a lot more likely to be alcoholics than women. Plus conservatives are much less likely to use weed than liberals. Skewing the board numbers lower. And lastly, as firearm owners we are all probably a lot less likely to use weed because it is prohibiting, but alcohol is only prohibiting if you get a lot of DUIs.Per the NIH (2012 numbers) habitual users of alcohol are less than 10% of the population. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4258136/
Per the CDC (2019) 18% of Americans used Marijuana in 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/marijuana/data-statistics.htm#:~:text=Marijuana is the most commonly,at least once in 2019.
Sure thing. Ever drink alcohol? Lots of people get intoxicated on that a lot. Not like smoking weed keeps you high your entire life. So long as you aren’t high, or drunk, while carrying a firearm, the issue is…?Responsible firearms ownership and usage begs for sobriety and clear-headedness (as do many other weighty responsibilities).
Heck, the scheduling even makes no sense, as schedule I specifically says there is no recognized medical use/value. Which isn’t true. At worst it should be a schedule II.Yeah. For a change this is an agency applying the law as it is written.
If Congress gets around to take THC out of schedule I , this will change, until then it remains a conflict between state and fed law.
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
You said it.True, but big difference between a good practice vs a government that will kick in doors and put someone in a cage over it.
LOL, think I'm too sober to understand this.
Heck, the scheduling even makes no sense, as schedule I specifically says there is no recognized medical use/value. Which isn’t true. At worst it should be a schedule II.
Same thing applies, sobriety is called for.Sure thing. Ever drink alcohol? Lots of people get intoxicated on that a lot.
No, but it does have a cumulative negative effect on cognition.Not like smoking weed keeps you high your entire life.
The nature of intoxication is that you willingly surrender your ability to make that distinction to the intoxicating substance.So long as you aren’t high, or drunk, while carrying a firearm, the issue is…?
I’m not seeing that law back in the 1700 and 1800’s so it does not apply now.
Government works for me not vice versa. FU ATF.
So does alcohol consumption. A cumulative negative impact on cognition.Same thing applies, sobriety is called for.
When you get your CC you're encouraged to carry regularly to get used to it, to make it a part of your life, to get to the point where you don't feel conspicuous doing it, where its second nature - habituation.
Doing the same with intoxication by normalizing it, is foolish and dangerous for the otherwise responsible gun owner and those around them.
No, but it does have a cumulative negative effect on cognition.
The nature of intoxication is that you willingly surrender your ability to make that distinction to the intoxicating substance.
This whole idea is as foolish as saying "I'm responsible, don't tell me what I can do....and now I'm going to use that freedom to do something (get intoxicated) which nullifies my capability of directing my own actions responsibly"
Still is today. Hemp was and still is used to make rope and many other products.Wasn’t hemp a cash crop back then?