A Win in NJ

[Harrys]

NJ CCW Laws Restricting W&C struck down.

 

[tdt91]

awesome

 

[rseymorejr]

I hope those pricks in Annapolis are watching this

 

[BPH102687]

NJ CCW Laws Restricting W&C struck down.

There we go. Bring that energy South

 

[Makanik]

Only a matter of time

 

[Cal68]

Fantastic news. Hoping to hear about its implications for MD.

Cal68

 

[wreckdiver]

Outstanding! That’s my home state. I moved to the “Free” state only to watch it turn in to New Jersey South.

 

[Squaregrouper]

NJ CCW Laws Restricting W&C struck down.

BREAKING NEWS!!! (5 days ago)

 

[platoonDaddy]

"[A]t oral argument, this Court specifically pressed the State whether it had empirical evidence to suggest that concealed carry permit holders are responsible for gun crimes or an increase in gun crimes in New Jersey, which they cite as justification for the law. However, the State had no such evidence," the opinion states.

 

[Nobody]

I would say more of a battle win than a war win. No win is a win until SCOTUS chimes in, and then they just start another war with us.

Nobody

 

[kshaw]

"[A]t oral argument, this Court specifically pressed the State whether it had empirical evidence to suggest that concealed carry permit holders are responsible for gun crimes or an increase in gun crimes in New Jersey, which they cite as justification for the law. However, the State had no such evidence," the opinion states.

That comment suggests that the court was using strict scrutiny rather that the new criteria from Bruen. It is still a big win whichever criteria they use.

 

[FrankZ]

That comment suggests that the court was using strict scrutiny rather that the new criteria from Bruen. It is still a big win whichever criteria they use.

Bad habits are hard to break.

 

[Dean5791]

"[A]t oral argument, this Court specifically pressed the State whether it had empirical evidence to suggest that concealed carry permit holders are responsible for gun crimes or an increase in gun crimes in New Jersey, which they cite as justification for the law. However, the State had no such evidence," the opinion states.

Great news. This is the strongest argument in CCW holders' favor. They are NOT the ones committing the crimes. It's like changing your tires when your car needs a new starter - and expect things to work.

 

[RFBfromDE]

I hope those pricks in Annapolis are watching this

Committed Commies don’t care.

They still think Commie failures are due to the people running Commie. They are convinced the new and improved Commie will work.

 

[press1280]

Great news. This is the strongest argument in CCW holders' favor. They are NOT the ones committing the crimes. It's like changing your tires when your car needs a new starter - and expect things to work.

Exactly. Glad this judge finally called out the anti gun groups bogus stats.
Most of the other judges I’ve seen give too much deference to them and don’t ask the simple question of who is behind the increased crime rates

 

[outrider58]

Committed Commies don’t care.

They still think Commie failures are due to the people running Commie. They are convinced the new and improved Commie will work...

...each time they try it.

 

[Blackbeard]

Great news. This is the strongest argument in CCW holders' favor. They are NOT the ones committing the crimes. It's like changing your tires when your car needs a new starter - and expect things to work.

Finally and agreed, I feel like this argument is often left unstated.

 

[HaveBlue]

Before Bruen, deference to the claims that supported the government’s compelling safety interest was standard practice.

 

[PeteW]

Hell yea. Annapolis needs to pay attention and the 4th circuit needs to bring that same energy.