boss281
Ultimate Member
SETUP
The Sig X-Macro comes in a few flavors, most with polymer based grips. I have the non-compensated version with the 3.7" barrel, the TACOPs with the same barrel, and the new alloy framed AXG Legion. My non-comp X-Macro came with suppressor height sights and a Romeo Elite. My TACOPs has the regular height night sights but I threw a spare Romeo Elite on there (the fixed front is still visible though shorter). I've had both for about a year and they shoot great, albeit the usual little snappy polymer compact. Recently I added the MCarbo trigger and spring upgrade to the TACOPS after both guns were well broken in.
Recently, I picked up the p365 axg legion. It has the same foot print as the X-Macros BUT, the grip module is a metal allow and overall and 4 ounces heavier. There are cuts at the front of the slide and the shorter 3.1" barrel. The sight radius is shorter on the AXG.
The two polymer frame guns have about 900 rounds through them over the past year, perhaps 100 more. I don't count. The AXG is brand new.
OBSERVATIONS
Today, I went to Guntry shooting range in Owings Mills and took these three guns. Note the non-comped polymer gun (all stock) is my carry gun.
I shot Federal 115g, 124g Sellier & Bellot, and Hornady 115g Critical Defense. Just note that all loaded, ejected and shot well. So no comparisons.
I shot at 5, 7 and 10 yards. The two polymer guns with the Romeo red dots are tack drivers at these distances. Yeah, they are snappy. But accurate for a light compact. I really, really dig these pistols. The upgraded springs and trigger in the TACOPS make a noticeable improvement to feel and reset for sure. I've never put the two on my wheeler gauge but i bet the pull on the upgraded gun is improved.
With this observation, I think my carry gun would benefit from the MCarbo upgrade and the TACOPS with the suppressor height sights. Not that important right now.
The AXG is a surprise. The snappiness of the polymer guns is greatly reduced, fit my hand better for some reason. I wish I had a holster for it as I would have loved to draw from it. It feels that good in my hands. I ran 50 rounds of 115g and 50 rounds of 124g, plus 25 rounds of my (expensive) Hornady. Almost every freaking shot was low left by an inch at all 3 distances.
Hand grip issue? Jerking or anticipating the trigger? It felt the same as the non-comped stock X-Macro as it should since the FCU is identical. Yet, I couldn't get it on target. I pulled the other two guns up and used the fixed sights instead of the dot. Tack drivers. The AXG in hand was a puzzle. I think I'll reevaluate seriously in another 400 rounds or so. But damn this is a fine shooter regardless, an inch down and left not withstanding. I have a Romeo X on backorder as well as holsters. This has the potential to become my on the hip IWB carry if a good break in gets me where I want it to be.
Was it worth the price over the typical X-Macro? Tough call, but I'd do it again. It just feels so darn good. I hope I get the POI on the bullseye soon.
The Sig X-Macro comes in a few flavors, most with polymer based grips. I have the non-compensated version with the 3.7" barrel, the TACOPs with the same barrel, and the new alloy framed AXG Legion. My non-comp X-Macro came with suppressor height sights and a Romeo Elite. My TACOPs has the regular height night sights but I threw a spare Romeo Elite on there (the fixed front is still visible though shorter). I've had both for about a year and they shoot great, albeit the usual little snappy polymer compact. Recently I added the MCarbo trigger and spring upgrade to the TACOPS after both guns were well broken in.
Recently, I picked up the p365 axg legion. It has the same foot print as the X-Macros BUT, the grip module is a metal allow and overall and 4 ounces heavier. There are cuts at the front of the slide and the shorter 3.1" barrel. The sight radius is shorter on the AXG.
The two polymer frame guns have about 900 rounds through them over the past year, perhaps 100 more. I don't count. The AXG is brand new.
OBSERVATIONS
Today, I went to Guntry shooting range in Owings Mills and took these three guns. Note the non-comped polymer gun (all stock) is my carry gun.
I shot Federal 115g, 124g Sellier & Bellot, and Hornady 115g Critical Defense. Just note that all loaded, ejected and shot well. So no comparisons.
I shot at 5, 7 and 10 yards. The two polymer guns with the Romeo red dots are tack drivers at these distances. Yeah, they are snappy. But accurate for a light compact. I really, really dig these pistols. The upgraded springs and trigger in the TACOPS make a noticeable improvement to feel and reset for sure. I've never put the two on my wheeler gauge but i bet the pull on the upgraded gun is improved.
With this observation, I think my carry gun would benefit from the MCarbo upgrade and the TACOPS with the suppressor height sights. Not that important right now.
The AXG is a surprise. The snappiness of the polymer guns is greatly reduced, fit my hand better for some reason. I wish I had a holster for it as I would have loved to draw from it. It feels that good in my hands. I ran 50 rounds of 115g and 50 rounds of 124g, plus 25 rounds of my (expensive) Hornady. Almost every freaking shot was low left by an inch at all 3 distances.
Hand grip issue? Jerking or anticipating the trigger? It felt the same as the non-comped stock X-Macro as it should since the FCU is identical. Yet, I couldn't get it on target. I pulled the other two guns up and used the fixed sights instead of the dot. Tack drivers. The AXG in hand was a puzzle. I think I'll reevaluate seriously in another 400 rounds or so. But damn this is a fine shooter regardless, an inch down and left not withstanding. I have a Romeo X on backorder as well as holsters. This has the potential to become my on the hip IWB carry if a good break in gets me where I want it to be.
Was it worth the price over the typical X-Macro? Tough call, but I'd do it again. It just feels so darn good. I hope I get the POI on the bullseye soon.