jcutonilli
Ultimate Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 2,474
it is not really about poorly argued or not, or the intent of the constitution -- it is about poltical views of the federal justices. That is where gun control cases align and to deny it is denial of the record and the clear partisan alignment of judges on almost all on gun control.
These cases are NOT decided by argument, or merit, but by poltical outcomes of numbers of appoints by winners of presidential elections.
If that is the case why did we lose this case. There were 6 republican appointed judges and 5 democrat appointed judges.
Why has SCOTUS not granted more 2A cases, the Court has been majority republican appointed since Heller? Why did they per curiam Caetano, which required at least one democrat appointed justice to vote for it? Why did they vote to hear the NYSRPA case, yet turn around and dismiss it as moot. Why did they deny all 10 cases they held during the NYSRPA case?
I think the answer is obvious, it really is about the arguments.