90+ Day Wait---An All Time High

[iH8DemLibz]

Howdy,

I put my paperwork in a week ago for an XD9 and I don't expect to see it for another 12 weeks.

So I thought I would get a jump start on the ridiculous wait time and start this thread.

It saddens me to think the posts will start rolling in quickly.

Maybe we'll get lucky and see some postive rulings on earlier releases coming down the pike from Pikesville.

 

[rwbow1969]

Quicker than you think, I just got my paperwork back. Day 90. I made it to the 90 day club, just barely.

 

[R1125]

I bought another on 5/30.. I think its going take more then 90 days this time around.

 

[AJRB]

http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=2464876#post2464876

This looks like official word went out this morning. Looks legit to me.

 

[ShallNotInfringe]

http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=2464876#post2464876

This looks like official word went out this morning. Looks legit to me.

They did not OK the release, they simply ordered FFL's to attach a notice that they were releasing on 8th day.

Gotta love the Govenrment's way of saying things. Imposing a requirement on the FFL.

 

[Brychan]

Wow and I was hating the wait on the two 9mm that I ordered last Saturday didn't get them until yesterday 7 whole days. Love C&R

 

[R1125]

http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?p=2464876#post2464876

This looks like official word went out this morning. Looks legit to me.

Just called my FFL he said the same thing.. Looks like i will have my gun soon

 

[USAFRavenR6]

Has this been confirmed? From what I read, it says that if the dealer releases that they need to notify the MSP. The only reason I see the MSP doing. This is so that those apps can jump to the front of the line in the event they need to be disapproved. This does not release any FFL fom being liable, BUT, a FFL could take this document to court stating that th MSP did not say not to release on day 8, in fact it says they can but they want to know about it.

I wonder if all the applications out there need to be redone so this cover letter can be attached now or if that is able to be faxed in later?

 

[MJD438]

They did not OK the release, they simply ordered FFL's to attach a notice that they were releasing on 8th day.

Gotta love the Govenrment's way of saying things. Imposing a requirement on the FFL.

A non statutory requirement as well...

 

[Pinecone]

Has this been confirmed? From what I read, it says that if the dealer releases that they need to notify the MSP. The only reason I see the MSP doing. This is so that those apps can jump to the front of the line in the event they need to be disapproved. This does not release any FFL fom being liable, BUT, a FFL could take this document to court stating that th MSP did not say not to release on day 8, in fact it says they can but they want to know about it.

I wonder if all the applications out there need to be redone so this cover letter can be attached now or if that is able to be faxed in later?

FFL has never been liable by law.

MSP has 7 days, by law, to Disapprove. It is up to MSP to get the gun if they Disapprove and it has been released.

NICS allows release after 3 days, as has been posted here, and based on talking to BATF.

 

[Pinecone]

I wonder if all the applications out there need to be redone so this cover letter can be attached now or if that is able to be faxed in later?

It doesn't say that applications have to be submitted this way to release on the 8th day, only that firearms that ARE released on the 8th day need the form resent, by fax, with the cover letter that it was an 8th day release.

We have received requests for information from dealers regarding the release of Regulated firearms on the 8th day. These are applications in which guns are released prior to receiving a NICS number. Dealers releasing regulated firearms on the 8th day, that are on the fax program, will submit the MSP Copy of the Maryland State Police Application and Affidavit to Purchase a Regulated Firearm with a notice attached to each application with the following statement, “Eighth day release of a regulated firearm.” It is imperative that the written notice of an “Eighth day release” be attached, not written on the actual application to ensure that we process them correctly.

 

[aireyc]

It doesn't say that applications have to be submitted this way to release on the 8th day, only that firearms that ARE released on the 8th day need the form resent, by fax, with the cover letter that it was an 8th day release.

You would think the MSP could write something without ambiguity. Nope.

 

[Ab_Normal]

You would think the politicians could write something without ambiguity. Nope.

Fixt.

I NOT DISAPPROVED this message.

 

[aireyc]

Fixt.

I NOT DISAPPROVED this message.

 

[Poonbag]

Quicker than you think, I just got my paperwork back. Day 90. I made it to the 90 day club, just barely.

When was your paperwork put in?

 

[agstevens05]

Mine was put in the beginning of April I believe. Getting kinda mad. It better be done soon as i Put money down on a AR

 

[raff696]

I am so happy that I do not have to join the 90 day club!

 

[PJDiesel]

They did not OK the release, they simply ordered FFL's to attach a notice that they were releasing on 8th day.

Who gave them the authority to make up the rules as the go?

This looks really great for them in their defense of the lawsuit BTW, backpedaling and CYA at it's finest.