Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,298
Never said it made sense, just reporting the climate, debate, and Legislative Intent behind it .
In recent decades the spin has all been about completing the background , but that's revisionist . That's not what it was about in 1966 .
It was all about * Cooling Off * . Go read the entire Bill File in Annapolis , all the testimony and debate was about Cooling Off Period . Read the contemporary news coverage was all about Cooling Off to prevent crimes of passion . For that matter, Cooling Off Periods were the major themes of the gun debate nationally in that era .
But why do they need a cooling off period for individuals who already own one or more regulated firearms?
Never said it made sense, just reporting the climate, debate, and Legislative Intent behind it .