Works for me.
+1
So could this be used against Mr Flush in some legal way?
Works for me.
Frosh on his knees for most of it...For those that didn't watch, Racine admits he and Brian talked.
I can imagine how that convo went.
I bet it started with Please, Please, Please and ended with a Thankyou, Thankyou, Thankyou !
hmmm that's strange, they mailed one to me.
Frosh on his knees for most of it...
and probably made that gulping sound Popeye makes when swallowing a can of spinach. Damn I hate that rat bastage.
This it?
Anyone who is in the hopper and was denied, try this.
This it?
Anyone who is in the hopper and was denied, try this.
This it?
Anyone who is in the hopper and was denied, try this.
I put in an application for a permit yesterday. I expected a crowd, but this was not the case. I walked right up to the window and was helped imminently by a pleasant uniformed officer. The whole process with finger prints and photo took less then 45 minuets and I saw two other people apply while I was there. An easy, pleasant experience especially in contrast to the hectic rush hour Metro ride to get there.
The officer's first question was "Have you applied before?" so they are ready for those that have been turned down previously. It sounds like previous applicants will get expedited treatment.
I asked if they have have been busy since the ruling came out last week and the friendly police woman said no.
Crossposted due to relevance:
https://crimeresearch.org/2017/10/d...-effectively-ban-anyone-legally-carrying-gun/
Suddenly I don't want to apply so much. That's ridiculous.
Read the prior posts. It's just double the penalty if you commit a crime in the red areas while carrying. It's prohibited to carry with a D.C. CCL in the red areas.
The way I read it, the mere act of carry within 1000 feet of one of these places is a crime.
No other crime need be committed.
is this correct?
it seems DC knows this law is a fustercluck