5.56blaster
Ultimate Member
I'm so tired of this F@&king state. I can't wait to get out of here! Stupid rules put in place by stupid people.
MSP LD advisory on FSA 2013 Compliance
- Thread starter swinokur
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
They've been practicing their intimidation tactics at the HPRB. It shows...
I have the feeling that the whole thing was made up to spoil the Christmas shopping season.
clandestine
AR-15 Savant
I think its VERY possible that the gun was in a legal configuration when it was sold by the MD FFL and the end user changed it to a banned configuration.
danb
dont be a dumbass
Honest, Officer, the flash hider was is the cleaning kit when I sold it. And that barrel was at least 7 oz heavier. 
Mr H
Banana'd
One.
Farging.
Rifle.
So, Big Bubba needs to show the peons his big stick (even though it's cracked, part of it's missing, and the duct tape is falling off).
Farging.
Rifle.
So, Big Bubba needs to show the peons his big stick (even though it's cracked, part of it's missing, and the duct tape is falling off).
Sniff. Sniff.. Sniff....
I smell a Frosh.
I smell a Frosh.
Blacksmith101
Grumpy Old Man
- Jun 22, 2012
- 22,294
I have the feeling that the whole thing was made up to spoil the Christmas shopping season.
A more accurate image of the current status of gun owners in Maryland would have been an image of the slave auction at the Annapolis docks.
- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
Interesting. According to that bulletin, to be banned, if it is not named, it has to have "completely interchangeable internal components" AND be "cosmetically similar."
So if it doesn't look like a named banned firearm, it doesn't matter if all the parts are interchangeable, it is OK.
BIG HOLE HERE.
So if it doesn't look like a named banned firearm, it doesn't matter if all the parts are interchangeable, it is OK.
BIG HOLE HERE.
Still waiting for the details
rickyp
Ultimate Member
- Sep 13, 2009
- 2,051
From what I saw it doesn't matter if it is cosmetic similar. They don't make you fill out the banned form just because it looks similar to a banned weapons.
To be considered a copycat the internal parts tjat make it fiction have to be interchangeable.
Not in this lifetime. This announcement is vague, fuzzy and without specifics--just like Maryland law--for a reason.
EL1227: I always enjoy your art. I can see that 2017 is going to be an Ed Art Festival!
We will know if they decide to prosecute ... if they don't prosecute, its just hot air.
Copy and copycat are not the same thing.
Dunno - why not shoot them an email and ask them? I'm sure they'll get right back to you.
As part of the Gov.'s new CS improvement program, you'll be ignored faster than ever.
Yeah. I'll get right on that. I was hoping somebody might have some insider info.Dunno - why not shoot them an email and ask them? I'm sure they'll get right back to you.
fabsroman
Ultimate Member
Yes, somebody from Delaware was charged under FSA2013 with possessing an assault weapon in the form of an AR-15.
https://www.mdcoastdispatch.com/201...ith-detectives-leads-to-weapons-drugs-arrest/
fabsroman
Ultimate Member
Does this advisory really do anything more than reiterate what the statute is? I think we all know what the statute is. Now, how it is interpreted is a completely different thing with a good amount of disagreement.
