Those not releasing on the 8th day are not worried about the MSP. They are worried about the ATF.Thing is, I think the real problem is the shops that are not releasing on time. The state has made it pretty clear that shops can release regulated firearms on the 8th day after submitting the Form 77r to the MSP if the shop has not heard back from the MSP.
I personally think it's because their work load is about to tripple.
I'm waiting for the uproar to start when people don't have their HQL's in hand on day 30, 31, 32, 33, 57, 78, 102, etc., etc., etc...
Those not releasing on the 8th day are not worried about the MSP. They are worried about the ATF.
Q: If a State is acting as a NICS point of contact (POC) and State law has requirements regarding the amount of time that a licensee must wait before transferring a firearm after contacting the State, should the licensee comply with the State requirements, the Federal requirements, or both?
The licensee must comply with both State and Federal requirements.
Example: State D is acting as a POC for NICS checks. State law requires a background check prior to the transfer of any firearm. State law also requires the licensee to wait 10 days to get a response from the State. The licensee must contact the State POC for a NICS check and a State background check. The licensee must comply with both Federal and State law by waiting 10 days for a response prior to transferring the firearm. If the licensee has not received a response from the State after 10 days, he or she may transfer the firearm.
I will be purchasing a handgun on October 1, just to see what happens when I don't have my HQL by October 30.
They seem crazy lately because they're stuck between doing what the Governor/GA is telling them to do and realizing that doing so could land theircollectivepersonally liable asses in a sling. Extreme personal conflict can often cause irrational behavior.
But I can't sell the gun I bought 2 months ago
But I can't sell the gun I bought 2 months ago
Ill read the case in a bit but side note.
I bought a beretta on 7/16/12 and want to sell it to help a woman out. I don't need the gun I just wanted a beretta to cerekote. Its now 9/26/13 and they haven't even looked at my app. I called and spoke to a civilian worker today who not only cut me off multiple times while taking but due to that was giving me wrong information because she wasn't understanding my question due to not letting me finish.
I deal with upset idiots everyday so I'm quite the patient man, today I had to stop her. "Ma'am, I'm a sworn officer and I understand what your saying however you keep interrupting me and giving me information that couldn't be more worthless. Please either stop talking so I can actually explain or transfer me to your supervisor" she shut up. But I can't sell the gun I bought 2 months ago
Showing your original 77r for the purchase should suffice even if they haven't recorded you as the legal owner yet. Others have done this already.
Wow! If I am reading this anywhere near right I would not be surprised if everyone in Annapolis is acting crazy. IANAL, but if I understand this a person, even an elected person, can be sued personally for violating another person, or persons civil rights. This would not be done to make the plantif wealthy, but would be done souly to impoverish the defendant for damages done in the form of denying rights. And as I read the decision, if for instance SB281 was found to be unconstitutional and a violation of citizen's rights, the possibility of bringing suit against the Govenor, personally becomes an interesting reality. May even be possible to personally sue the legislators who voted for it.
But I ain't no lawyer and could be completely off base