MAYORS SPONSOR SUPERBOWL ADD GUN CONTROL

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • MessedUpMike

    Active Member
    Jan 29, 2011
    214
    It ran sometime after tha halftime show. Since it wasn't funny and didn't involve animals or talking babies I bet it was largely ignored.
     

    Pushrod

    Master Blaster
    Aug 8, 2007
    2,981
    WV High Country
    I don't hear anyone publicly stating the reasons why we oppose background checks for private sales(at least how it currently operates). They shouldn't allow these types of messages to go unchecked.

    If the purpose of our forefather's on proposing and ratifying the second amendment was to assure that the federal government would not be able to deprive the people of the respective states of the ultimate means to resist the actions or policies of that government.

    Assuming it's possible that the government and the people might one day find themselves as enemies in battle, does it not do harm to the people's position to let the government decide what arms they may have and who among them may have arms, and to let the government know who has what?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,592
    Messages
    7,287,766
    Members
    33,482
    Latest member
    Claude

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom