Would someone more learned than I please explain why the Anti-Gunners are focusing on calling firearms "Weapons of War?" Was there something in a court case that said you can or can not ban weapons in Common Use, verses being able to ban weapons of war?
I'm confused. It seems to me with more than 8 million AR style rifles out there, they have to be considered firearms in common use. Why are the anti-gunners calling them weapons of war?
Thanks!
-Tom-
I'm confused. It seems to me with more than 8 million AR style rifles out there, they have to be considered firearms in common use. Why are the anti-gunners calling them weapons of war?
Thanks!
-Tom-