Last Lead Smelter in U.S. to close.

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Melnic

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 27, 2012
    15,414
    HoCo
    I almost started hoarding bullets till I saw a press release from one of the bullet manufacturers. I think it was Sierra who said it would not affect them.
     

    vin

    Ultimate Member
    Mar 19, 2009
    1,327
    Bowie, MD
    Old news, and it's a very poorly researched article. The smelter made primary lead which is frankly too expensive for bullets.
     

    whistlersmother

    Peace through strength
    Jan 29, 2013
    8,986
    Fulton, MD
    Holy thread resurrection!

    These guys were trying to build a new type of battery. Instead, they ended up with a new way of smelting that's a lot more environmentally friendly.

    Granted, they used antimony sulfide, but I suspect lead sulfide would work just as well, but a higher temperature.

    Essentially, they used molten semiconductor, antimony sulfide, as a layer in their molten metal battery. While this has sorta been done before in previous smelting operations, the new thing is that they also stacked your "normal" battery layer on top - NaCl, KCl, and Na2S which allowed the separation of the sulfur from the antimony. Complete screw-up from a battery standpoint, but maybe a revolution in the smelting of metal sulfides.

    http://news.mit.edu/2016/new-method-producing-some-metals-0824
     

    K31

    "Part of that Ultra MAGA Crowd"
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 15, 2006
    35,693
    AA county
    Holy thread resurrection!

    These guys were trying to build a new type of battery. Instead, they ended up with a new way of smelting that's a lot more environmentally friendly.

    Granted, they used antimony sulfide, but I suspect lead sulfide would work just as well, but a higher temperature.

    Essentially, they used molten semiconductor, antimony sulfide, as a layer in their molten metal battery. While this has sorta been done before in previous smelting operations, the new thing is that they also stacked your "normal" battery layer on top - NaCl, KCl, and Na2S which allowed the separation of the sulfur from the antimony. Complete screw-up from a battery standpoint, but maybe a revolution in the smelting of metal sulfides.

    http://news.mit.edu/2016/new-method-producing-some-metals-0824

    I call bullsh|t.

    They claim they have "99.9 percent pure antimony at the bottom of their cell". Everyone here knows that's an impossible percentage of antimony.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,826
    Messages
    7,297,442
    Members
    33,526
    Latest member
    Comotion357

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom