Taser Lawsuit Filed in New Jersey

DIVISION 3. - GUN REPLICAS

Sec. 58-141. - Definition.
Gun replica. A reproduction of an authentic weapon with similar design, weight and components of its real counterpart, which shoots BBs, pellets, darts or other projectiles made of plastic, metal or other materials.

(Ord. No. 2003-20, 7-21-2003)

Sec. 58-142. - Prohibited acts.
(a)
It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, barter, offer to sell, distribute, manufacture, give away, transfer or dispose of a gun replica or any part thereof, assembled or unassembled to a minor. As used herein, "person" includes an individual, partnership, corporation or any other entity.
(b)
It shall be unlawful for any minor to possess a gun replica or any part thereof, assembled or unassembled.
(c)
A person may not:
(1)
Wear, carry, or transport a gun replica, whether concealed or open, on or about the person; or
(2)
Wear, carry, or knowingly transport a gun replica, whether concealed or open, in a vehicle traveling on a street, road, boardwalk, alley or parking lot generally used by the public.
(d)
There is a rebuttable presumption that a person who transports a gun replica transports the gun replica knowingly.
(Ord. No. 2003-20, 7-21-2003)

Sec. 58-143. - Violations and penalties.
Any violator of any of the provisions of this division, upon conviction thereof, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to a fine of up to $1,000.00 or to imprisonment of up to six months, or to both fine and imprisonment. In addition to such penalties, the Mayor and City Council of Ocean City shall have the right to pursue all other legal and equitable remedies in the appropriate courts.

(Ord. No. 2003-20, 7-21-2003)

Click to expand...

adit said:

It looks like they do.

https://www.municode.com/library/md...IPR_ARTIIIOFINPUSA_DIV4ELWE_S58-162SAPOELWEPR

Click to expand...

esqappellate said:

Anyone live in Ocean City.......

Click to expand...

A homeowner possessing same in the confines of the home. As used herein homeowner means the owner or tenant, spouse and relatives, over the age of 18 residing therein. Homeowner does not include tenants or guests residing or staying for periods less than one year.
(iii)

Click to expand...

wolfwood said:

we are wrapping up this taser business nationwide. I suspect the only place we need to actually sue is Rhode Island. This article is from Westminster the last place with a taser ban in maryland.

Click to expand...

press1280 said:

Wait what about NY?

Click to expand...

HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Second Amendment guarantees individuals a fundamental right to keep and bear arms for self-defense District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008); McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010); Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U.S. __(2016). Further, “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.” Heller, 554 U.S. at 582; Caetano, slip op. at 1 (per curiam).

2. Pursuant to the holdings in Heller, McDonald and Caetano, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:39-3(h), to the extent this statute outright prohibits, under criminal penalty, individuals from possessing electronic arms, is declared unconstitutional in that it violates the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and shall not be enforced.

Click to expand...

wolfwood said:

well NJ is now effectively done. This consent decree was filed by both parties last night.

Click to expand...

GlocksAndPatriots said:

Ahh yes. The state gets 180 days to "work it out," but when courts invented rights to marry the opposite sex, gay marriage licenses were issued the next day.

Click to expand...

Stoveman said:

Does it have to be their primary residence? A buddy of mine and his wife own a condo in OC and would probably be up for it.

Click to expand...

DC-W said:

Potential vacationer?

Click to expand...

ryan_j said:

I'm glad you realize that marriage in general is an invention. But I'd think that people already had the right to marry the opposite sex.

And for what it's worth, while that was the case in NJ, in Kentucky after obergefell Kim Davis refused to issue licenses for quite some time.

Click to expand...