If I ever get an HK it would be a .45 its my next caliber on my list!
No .45, you really are deprived. Well if you ever want to shoot an HK .45 let me know and we will make a range trip.
If I ever get an HK it would be a .45 its my next caliber on my list!
No .45, you really are deprived. Well if you ever want to shoot an HK .45 let me know and we will make a range trip.
BHP are not gay..... Only SW MPs...LOL
BTW...Nice manpurse
I welcome any HK shooter that wants to come put his up against my M&P. I shoot at AAFG and ESPS.
You are comparing shooters not guns. We are comparing guns. If I went up against you in a competition shoot and lost I would blame myself not my weapon.
I welcome any HK shooter that wants to come put his up against my M&P. I shoot at AAFG and ESPS.
Ill do it in a ransom rest, factory ammo. My Factory USP Tactical against a Factory M&P. I would do the same test against the top 1911 models too.
Ill put $100 on the USP shooting better groups against the M&P.
If you read my earlier post I praised the M&P. Its a great gun, much better ergos than a HK, but make no mistake the HK USP Tactical shoots circles (Accuracy wise) around the M&P. I sold a Glock to get a M&P, and havent looked back.
olzkool:
remember the sacred words: NO COMPROMISE
Anyways...If I lost to an M&P.. I'm definitely blaming the gun, then conveniently switch to a SIG.
+1 C
But better ergos than a usp? C'mon, that is the most ergonomically correct pistol I ever held, fits like an elephant in a volkswagon.
Now my P7M8, I would go against your M&P with that. You get the rest I will hold mine left handed with some of those red and green 3d glasses on and still put em all in the same hole.
Yes I do drink the HK Kool Aid, but it tastes good and is less filling