When someone asks what is going on in this world ?
Part of what the DemocRATs have been doing is creating psychological disorders … on purpose.
It’s all part of Frankfurt Socialism and critical theory. Whether they realize it or not, DemocRATs and the leftist MSM sycophants are working together using critical theory to generate and ramp up emotions/hate against Trump and Republicans in general. It could be that just some oligarch Soros-type high ups are in on it, but it is the purpose of everything going on. From the ANTIFA rallies to the pro-Trump rallies in reaction. What we’re seeing is heightened discord that is constantly being stoked to a tipping point that has not happened ... YET. Europe is seeing the same discord with the migrant Muslim situation that was engineered and kicked off by the Arab Spring.
Its layer upon layer of social discord that is ramping up to a tipping point -and I’d argue that mass migration/immigration is a genius move that prevents any sort of pressure release.
The media is following Rules for Radicals (which was built on the tenets of critical theory) they’re pushing a false critical narrative constantly keeping their opponent off balance (why we have a lame congress), while at the same time inciting their low information base that doesn’t know any better as they can't think for themselves. The proof is visible ... look at the election They were told for a year by the MSM that Hillary was going to win, and their reaction when reality collided with their critical theory reality bubble was an nervous breakdown and for some a full psychotic break. We witnessed a result of critical theory brainwashing this AM.
This was proven again as they were told for half a year that Trump was under investigation for collusion with Russia, and then they found out that he wasn’t ... But what was JUST leaked is that Mueller is investigating Trump for obstruction of justice. I guarantee that today's DemocRAT kumbaya sympathies will be short lived.
I give them 24 hours tops. It's all they have. They just can't help themselves.
Keep your powder dry.
Alinsky quoting from chapter one in Crime and Punishment of the main character Raskolnikov, who owes an old woman some money and can’t pay it back so he decides to kill her. To murder her in cold blood. He trys to talk himself into committing this horrible act of violence. That’s the “new step” that he fears. The “new step” that Alinsky wants to help his team of “organizers” help their communities to take. The “new step” of the brave new world of modern ethics. The not-so-new step of pretending that the ends justify the means. That any act is justifiable, any means allowable, if only I want the end bad enough.
Alinsky doesn’t leave it there. In a chapter entitled “On Means and Ends” he has this to say:
That perennial question, “Does the end justify the means?” is meaningless as it stands; the real and only question regarding the ethics of means and ends is, and always has been, “Does this particular end justify this particular means?…The end is what you want, and the means is how you get it…The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work.” (Rules, page 24)
It didn't last 12 hours with CNN. They started on President Trump before the 7pm show aired. They had plenty of Dems on talking about this Obstruction of Justice fiasco.
This civil war is very different than the last one. There are no cannons or cavalry charges. The left doesn’t want to secede. It wants to rule. Political conflicts become civil wars when one side refuses to accept the existing authority. The left has rejected all forms of authority that it doesn’t control.
The left has rejected the outcome of the last two presidential elections won by Republicans. It has rejected the judicial authority of the Supreme Court when it decisions don’t accord with its agenda. It rejects the legislative authority of Congress when it is not dominated by the left.
It rejected the Constitution so long ago that it hardly bears mentioning.
The left is a treasonous movement. The Democrats became a treasonous organization when they fell under the sway of a movement that rejects our system of government, its laws and its elections. Now their treason is coming to a head. They are engaged in a struggle for power against the government. That’s not protest. It’s not activism. The old treason of the sixties has come of age. A civil war has begun.
There was a book released back in the late 90s called Civil War II, The Breaking Up of America. It spoke of a racially divided America. There is a pdf copy of it floating around the internet somewhere. It's a little outdated but still worth the read.
Western Civilization will be transformed; tribalism will blossom into its ultimate expression. Nations will unite into super blocks of Europeans against Africans. Christians against Moslems, East against West, and rich against poor until some hideous climax predator claws its way to the top of the smoking global bone heap. And what excuse will we Americans have? That our fathers didn't leave us a Bill of Rights to light our way? That noone cautioned us that a house divided against itself cannot stand? That no one told us that we should judge one another by character rather than color?
Like all men of goodwill, I ask nothing more than to live peacefully in my own country where I enjoy the equal protection of the law without corruption of blood, exactly as set down in our Constitution. Regrettably, this simple and just concept is dead, and so is America.
Read the chapter "Civil War II Checklist" on what to watch for, or more pointed, what has already transpired.
Harvard U.Item 8: Resegregation: Watch for Africans and other minorities demanding, and often getting, separate facilities for themselves, another clear sign that they're continuing to
reject co-option.
We're getting close. And they are 'strike anywhere' matches."It would indeed be the ultimate tragedy if the history of the human race proved to be nothing more noble than the story of an ape playing with a box of matches on a petrol dump." - David Ormsby- Gore
More like a breaking point for a group hug or another ball game when it comes to politicians. R's seem very timid given the desired outcome the ball field guy planned on. Then again I have no idea what the correct answer is.
With all that's going on right now with the tearing down of memorials and ensuing violence, are we witnessing the continued 'slow burn' started by the previous administration?