MD doesn't have a list like we are discussing because they haven't had to compile one. Everyone is restricted.
They will make one. A big one.
The requirement to have a permit will almost surely pass strict constitutional muster, as long as the process fulfills an overriding interest of the government (restricting guns from dangerous people, etc.), is narrowly tailored, and is the least restrictive way of meeting the need. MD will need to tow that line. You can ponder what that line looks like and probably argue forever on the details (NC can issue a permit the same day...why can't MD?, etc.)...but at the end of the day there will be no "Constitutional Carry" the way many of you think of it (no permit, no restrictions).
Assuming we win, the next fights will be over sensitive places, fees, permit processing, etc.
I am seriously interested in where fees are going. I think they will stay, but be highly regulated and limited in scope and price. From a more practical matter I am interested in the time it takes to issue a permit and what data they will try to use. Can they ask for a medical release to ensure you are not on heavy meds or been diagnosed clinically depressed (VA talked about this and I think it got shot down)?
Lots of details need to be worked out and the arguments will never end.
How many think MD will continue issuing permits for 3 years instead of the standard 5 or in FL's case, 7 years?