- Oct 25, 2012
- 3,373
Playing games with SCOTUS worked out well for NY with Bruen.They (7th) did this on purpose to keep it from getting struck down nationwide.
Playing games with SCOTUS worked out well for NY with Bruen.They (7th) did this on purpose to keep it from getting struck down nationwide.
But doesn't someone have to bring the issue TO them in order to act?My prayer is still SCOTUS will send Injunctive relief.
On January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, lifted lower court injunctions that had blocked enforcement in 25 states of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Interim Final Rule requiring healthcare worker vaccinations (CMS Rule)
I think they already have the issue in front of them. They have asked for and received briefings. I know they are smart enough to see through the 7CA's ploy to continue deprivation of rights and I am praying they act.But doesn't someone have to bring the issue TO them in order to act?
But doesn't someone have to bring the issue TO them in order to act?
May 12 2023 | letter of State of Illinois submitted. |
It already has a reputation... The judges will wear yet another spanking as a badge of honor.The 9th doesn’t seem to mind
This is not going to end well for the 7th. The question is how bad will the spanking by SCOTUS be and does the 7th really want to be spanked?
Oof. That last paragraph is NOT going to win him any favors with the Justice.
May 12 2023 letter of State of Illinois submitted.
An interlocutory TRO/PI has always been a long shot but Justice Barrett's asking for briefs did it's job and got the attention of the 7th Circuit, why else would they have fast tracked the proceedings. Thank you Justice Barrett!