The final bill hasn’t been released yet. @esqappellate said we’d see it soon:
He’s probably too busy reading SB1 and rubbing one out
:-)
foxbaltimore.com
Sounds like Gov. Less could not ascertain a good and substantial reason for someone else to carry in "...hospitals, and churches and schools". Uh oh. That smells funky and un-Constitutional. See you in court, jackass!Governor Moore said he'll sign SB 1:
Gov. Moore says he will sign SB 1; some call plan limiting legal gun owners 'backwards'
After a flurry of action in the House and Senate Chambers in the Maryland State House, the 2023 legislative session is in the books. Democrats in leadership, in
Like many Republican lawmakers, McCray cited concerns about the constitutionality of the legislation. When asked about the potential legal challenges, Gov. Wes Moore said Attorney General Anthony Brown had confidence in the plan. Moore also said he will sign the legislation.
Maybe this Judge is waiting for that to actually happen.... Who knows at this point.
As long as they maintain power the crime is an acceptable cost for them.
Don't you love how they lump the law abiding in with the criminals.
Yup. It's a deliberate messaging strategy to do that.
Absolutely. Blur the lines. If you have a gun you are part of the problem
Yup. This "line blurring" comms strategy is specifically used on a number of issues to control and manipulate the conversation around them.
For SB 1? (@esqappellate) Hopefully that Judge is more amenable to issuing a TRO than this one has been.
A TRO is a short-term order to prevent immediate, ongoing harm. IIRC ESQ has posted here he intends to file suit after SB1 becomes law, but before it takes effect. So a preliminary injunction (PI) is what would be sought.
