@SomeGuy I would like to tell you I was wrong about Muse and I hope to be shocked by Conaway but I doubt it.
He probably did a lot of THT research and because he couldn't find any analogs thought he would just invent something and give it fancy names.Yep
He didn't do any THT research
Suspect he got inspired by Star Trek one evening. Now whether it was Scotty or LaForge that was to blame is a different argument.He probably did a lot of THT research and because he couldn't find any analogs thought he would just invent something and give it fancy names.
"Comparative time-space burden" come on man are you trying to write science fiction?
If that video was used as evidence would it be available with a FOI request? It could be a internet video sensation.For those of you playing the home game and are not as familiar with some of the critters, the dim bulb who said that an establishment that applies for a liquor license is presumed to be anti carry is Sen (former Delegate) Ariana "Areola" Kelly. Interesting past she has.....
District 16 Del. Ariana Kelly Charged With Indecent Exposure, Trespassing
Updated- 10:20 a.m., Wednesday – State Del. Ariana Kelly was arrested last month in Bethesda and charged with indecent exposure and trespassing, according to online court records. District Court charging documents state Kelly, 38, was dropping off her children at the home of her ex-husband...moco360.media
FTA:
God bless the poor bastards who had to view that video, not all heroes wear capes.
Amazing what gets promotedFor those of you playing the home game and are not as familiar with some of the critters, the dim bulb who said that an establishment that applies for a liquor license is presumed to be anti carry is Sen (former Delegate) Ariana "Areola" Kelly. Interesting past she has.....
District 16 Del. Ariana Kelly Charged With Indecent Exposure, Trespassing
Updated- 10:20 a.m., Wednesday – State Del. Ariana Kelly was arrested last month in Bethesda and charged with indecent exposure and trespassing, according to online court records. District Court charging documents state Kelly, 38, was dropping off her children at the home of her ex-husband...moco360.media
FTA:
God bless the poor bastards who had to view that video, not all heroes wear capes.
So should breaking one's constitutional oath. In fact, knowingly ignoring it at the time of reciting it should be treated as perjury. I know we're not supposed to, but I can't help it - there are no words the describe the level of contempt an hate I have for those tyrants.That SHOULD be a disqualifying crime.
But they do care for criminals. They bend over backwards to not have any law affect them.What have we learned about the MD GA, specifically the Dem supermajority, from their treatment of SB1?
They don't care about the Constitution
They don't care for the Supreme Court
They don't care about the law-abiding citizens
They don't care about their oath of office
They don't care about wasting the taxes they extort from the public
They don't care to listen to reasoned opposition
They don't have to care about any of the above
They'll use any excuse, however dubious, unconstitutional or immoral/unethical, to follow the diktats of the Progressive Party
In their heart of hearts, most of them would prefer to see us dead.
That's where the money is; cash flows to defense lawyers, and ensures the job security of judges, prosecutors, police brass, and exacerbates the fear level of the population, which guarantees re-election for incumbents in all elective offices.But they do care for criminals. They bend over backwards to not have any law affect them.
It is undisputed that petitioners Koch and Nash—two ordinary, law-abiding, adult citizens—are part of “the people” whom the Second Amendment protects. See Heller, 554 U. S., at 580. And no party disputes that handguns are weapons “in common use” today for self-defense. See id., at 627. The Court has little difficulty concluding also that the plain text of the Second Amendment protects Koch’s and Nash’s proposed course of conduct—carrying handguns publicly for self-defense. Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms, and the definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Moreover, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” id., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home. Pp. 23–24.
And don’t care.They know that
That's where the money is; cash flows to defense lawyers, and ensures the job security of judges, prosecutors, police brass, and exacerbates the fear level of the population, which guarantees re-election for incumbents in all elective offices.
But you can still carry anyplace that isn't "sensitive" ........or within 100 yards of those places.I know I'm preaching to the choir, and of course, IANAL, but when I read this in Bruen:
... it kind of makes me think that these lawmakers can't read at all.
If everywhere is sensitive, then nowhere is sensitive.But you can still carry anyplace that isn't "sensitive" ........or within 100 yards of those places.
They know that
Yeah I was very disappointed by Muse, Sydnor and James. They must get a lot of money from the state party and Bloomberg. A lot.@SomeGuy I would like to tell you I was wrong about Muse and I hope to be shocked by Conaway but I doubt it.
I know… that was massive frustration speaking (on my part). I just can’t with those people anymore. Especially Waldstreicher. Smith was also deeply disappointing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And yes, I am now thinking Conaway might be like the rest and not quite the supporter and advocate of civil rights as we are led to believe. I hope I'm wrong.@SomeGuy I would like to tell you I was wrong about Muse and I hope to be shocked by Conaway but I doubt it.