We used to play "horse" on the range and 100yd pistol shots were often the objective. I could hit pretty consistently with a stock G17 once I found the hold - something like 2-3x (i.e. 50%) out of 5 attempts on an IPSC-type steel target.
What would the holdover be on something like that?I watched the match director/RO crew at Allegheny Sniper Challenge bang torso-size steel targets at 200+ yards with iron-sighted 1911s with amazing regularity.
Why would you say something like that?...Rimfire is only good to 200yds.
They didn't do 'holdovers' per se`, they raised the front sight blade to alter the sight picture and expressed their corrections as 'half a blade up', 'quarter blade', etc..
By raising the blade over the rear sight notch, one can always see the target...
What would the holdover be on something like that?
E. Shell is correct , and channeling Elmer Kieth , with the front sight raised in the notch , and preferred method .
That said , for grins, I did figure some hold overs for longer than short range out to 100yd . For convience and ease of communication , I grouped into two rough classes of pistols.. Of interest here is. .45acp 230 gr/ 147gr 9mn / 158gr .38spl . Starting with zero for 6 o'clock hold @ 25yds , aka 1.0 to 1.5 inch high .
Sighted thusly , as rough rule of thumb :
0-50 yds - aim center mass
75 yds - aim 4-6 inch high
100 yd - aim at neck of silhouette .
"Many of us suffer with limitations we set for ourselves."Why would you say something like that?
From a 75 yard zero, it takes 73 MOA correction to zero my .22LR sub-sonics at 400 yards on the average day. Provided your ammo has consistent velocity (reduces vertical stringing) and decent wind calls, a 12" plate is not hard to hit at 400. Many of my students have shot my rifle at this distance and it was a valuable tool when I had someone with a flinch that I was pointing out and trying to cure.
In order to get enough upward travel in my 1" scope, I had to shim the rear of the mount base. I set it to where it would barely go 'down' enough to get a 75 yard zero, but then had almost the entire adjustment travel to go 'up'.
Because the sub-sonics experience less air resistance than super-sonic bullets, the retained velocity and resulting energy at long distances can be surprising. One of the guys at Sniper's Hide experimented with partially-thawed frozen turkeys at extended ranges and got full penetration at 300 & 400 yards.
Many of us suffer with limitations we set for ourselves.
Why would you say something like that?
From a 75 yard zero, it takes 73 MOA correction to zero my .22LR sub-sonics at 400 yards on the average day. Provided your ammo has consistent velocity (reduces vertical stringing) and decent wind calls, a 12" plate is not hard to hit at 400. Many of my students have shot my rifle at this distance and it was a valuable tool when I had someone with a flinch that I was pointing out and trying to cure.
In order to get enough upward travel in my 1" scope, I had to shim the rear of the mount base. I set it to where it would barely go 'down' enough to get a 75 yard zero, but then had almost the entire adjustment travel to go 'up'.
Because the sub-sonics experience less air resistance than super-sonic bullets, the retained velocity and resulting energy at long distances can be surprising. One of the guys at Sniper's Hide experimented with partially-thawed frozen turkeys at extended ranges and got full penetration at 300 & 400 yards.
Many of us suffer with limitations we set for ourselves.
Have used a 22 revolver at 100 yards with a scope on it. Works fine.Just curious if any of you regularly shoot a semiautomatic pistol at 100 yards. If so are you having any success and what are you using. We have it a try yesterday with a variety a pistols and seemed to have the most success with a Sig P320 full size I built. I'm going to take my Glock G34 Next time and give it a try.