I'll admit, I've tended to favor some training requirements based on some very poor behavior I've witnessed by people with handguns. But I understand the argument that, like 1A, you first start out with everyone has nearly-unlimited right, and then you limit/prosecute it when it is abused (fire in a crowded theater).
So my question to the group is: what conditions would you find acceptable for banning a person's future right to carry publicly?
Perhaps brandishing? Discharge when not in self defence scenario? Carrying while intoxicated? Non-felony battery or assault? Etc?
Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
My opinion is if you aren't prohibited you can carry without restriction.