Virginia - First Republican Defects

[buellsfurn]

It got deleted. I got a screenshot (see above).

didn't recognize the hair

 

[Allen65]

The bill appears to be another Bloomberg astroturf product. It uses the weird redefinition language of C&R seen in other draft bills from the same ultimate source.

 

[buellsfurn]

I don’t see the MDS comment

this

 

[Batt816]

I am seeing the ones posted in the past hour. But you can tell someone must be deleting whatever doesn’t support their agenda periodically.

 

[buellsfurn]

found them 3 days 28 mins

 

[fred55]

Orrock is my district representative, I’ve met him several times and had several 2A discussions and email exchanges with him - most recently at a holiday party. I have just sent him a scathing email regarding his bill and his need to withdraw it. I’ll be calling him Monday and repeating my email message. This bill is out of the blue and it’s more than a bit distressing. fred55

 

[shootin the breeze]

Orrock is my district representative, I’ve met him several times and had several 2A discussions and email exchanges with him - most recently at a holiday party. I have just sent him a scathing email regarding his bill and his need to withdraw it. I’ll be calling him Monday and repeating my email message. This bill is out of the blue and it’s more than a bit distressing. fred55

Ten pounds of shit in a five pound bag just like every politician everywhere and for all time. They aren’t worth your used TP.

 

[Deep Lurker]

Evidently Orrock can’t make a Republican legislative decision without first consulting his own precious “NON-PARTISAN ADVISORY COUNCIL” ... LOL.

This might seem less cosmically lame if Orrock faked consultation with a “bipartisan” advisory council, but Orrock still obviously believes there are “non-partisans” eager to join him in his decisional wheelhouse.

Oops - - maybe not: looks from their “sorry can’t make it” comments that even Orrock is too lame for non-partisans:

https://m.facebook.com/delegateorrock/photos/a.727104340751438/2386625054799350/?type=3&source=48

 

[HRDWRK]

As of 0330 12/28- 83 comments and you can only see 34 of the comments....

 

[Norton]

As of 0330 12/28- 83 comments and you can only see 34 of the comments....

Interesting, I can see a lot of them from our people.

 

[Alea Jacta Est]

Don’t be a TYRANNIS.

 

[teratos]

Don’t be a TYRANNIS.

Or you’ll get a torn anus.

 

[Engine4]

Teratos, he's deleted your post as well as MDS's about "deleting posts". What a tool.

 

[teratos]

Teratos, he's deleted your post as well as MDS's about "deleting posts". What a tool.

I can still see mine. Posted more, just for fun.

 

[Engine4]

I can still see mine. Posted more, just for fun.

Weird. His post says 85 comments, but even with "View all comments" clicked, I don't see all 85. I see your's that you just did but not your others. Commies.

 

[Adolph Oliver Bush]

Someone just linked the court case. I saw very few negative comments, even "viewing more" and clicking "replies"

 

[teratos]

Someone just linked the court case. I saw very few negative comments, even "viewing more" and clicking "replies"

‘Twas me.

 

[Stoveman]

I piled on just for grins.

 

[PowPow]

Some see the comments. Others do not see the comments. Some may only see their own. It sounds like the algorithms in the book of feces are working as designed. I have absolutely no expectation for the Facebook product to work as one would expect, particularly when it involves politicians and politicial issues. What you see is not what you signed up for. It's what they want you to see and to not see.

 

[Engine4]

It's what they want you to see and to not see.

Very true.