I wonder how much arm twisting Frosh will do to keep Hawaii from petitioning for cert, just like he did with DC in Wrenn?
This will have no bearing in regards to national reciptocity (that's a US Legislature thing) and no impact on MD.
I wonder how much arm twisting Frosh will do to keep Hawaii from petitioning for cert, just like he did with DC in Wrenn?
It’ll be interesting to see if Hawaii can stand folks with guns on their hips, open carry. If the take the case as is. The 9th may sua sponte if HI doesn’t. A couple other options...
I won
A lot of good 2A legal news coming from the lower courts lately. Would like to see SCOTUS do the same. Not aware of any 2A decisions that may be on thier plate soon but I’m getting anxious.
A lot of good 2A legal news coming from the lower courts lately. Would like to see SCOTUS do the same. Not aware of any 2A decisions that may be on thier plate soon but I’m getting anxious.
It’ll be interesting to see if Hawaii can stand folks with guns on their hips, open carry. If the take the case as is. The 9th may sua sponte if HI doesn’t. A couple other options...
Large numbers of people will habitually open carry, making it infeasible to harass them into leaving their guns at home, and eventually making open carry a routine non-event;
-------OR--------
A small minority will open carry, making it a one-off fluke to be driven underground by the hysterical Liberal majority of the population and tourists' attacks of vapours and screams of horror.
I won
This is the whole docket
http://michellawyers.com/young-v-hawaii/
Please read the supplemental brief we file after Peruta that is a lot better done than the opening brief. I grew as a writer in the 4 years between that and the opening brief.
http://michellawyers.com/wp-content....-Hawaii_Appellants-Supplemental-Brief_87.pdf
Arguments are in Hawaii in Feb. 12 2017
Our position is that we don't care what type of carry we get but based on Peruta the only type we can get is open.
Hawaii is essentially a complete ban and my client asked for either open or concealed carry. I don't see how the Ninth rules against me without widening the current circuit split.
Oh they'll ask for en banc. Thing is though since the whole en banc process takes forever in CA9 (unless they just decide they can't pull off the legal gymnastics and just deny it), we could easily have the NJ case already getting cert.
In the event en banc is denied look for the state to combine the permits into a general carry permit (like MD) in the hopes people will just conceal.
Since this is binding for the entire 9CA, what is Commiefornia going to do in the meantime while they are waiting with their fingers crossed for a en banc reversal???
Since this is binding for the entire 9CA, what is Commiefornia going to do in the meantime while they are waiting with their fingers crossed for a en banc reversal???
Can Hawaii just grant permit to Young to make this go away?
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Young has indeed stated a claim that section 134-9’s limitations on the issuance of open carry licenses violate the Second Amendment.22
REVERSED as to the County, DISMISSED as to the State,23 and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.24
Each time you stand before the Courts, the easier it will be for you. Keep up the good work. I look forward to seeing you stand before the SCoUS some day.
Forget standing before them. At this point they should kneel before Wolfwood.
I remember when Wolfwood first posted about Young in early 2013. I thought then that here was a youthful lawyer stepping beyond his natural limits. You know that cartoon of the mouse flipping off the swooping hawk? Like that. But in a short time Wolfwood began winning, sometimes in a minor way and sometimes bigly (Young being bigly.)
A 9th CA panel stating that the 2A protects open carry? No lawyer has ever done that before. Bigly, indeed .
Wow! I got news alerts about this today, came to find the relevant MDS thread, and then saw this.I won