j_h_smith
Ultimate Member
- Jul 28, 2007
- 28,516
That makes it even worse. She was Ok with "any interested party" clause.
If she even read the Bill. I have my doubts. I think she just glanced over it and said yeah, this is good. Lets get the firearms away from those who are dangerous. Little did she know the Dems managed to word this Bill to read one way, but had a more devious underlying intention.
I have little doubt this original Bill wouldn't have passed if not for those of us on MDS who actually read the Bill and understood it's true meaning. To those folks I want to thank you.
When the R's started with the excuse that since no organization opposed the Bill, they decided to vote YES. However, if they would have read the Bill thoroughly, they would have seen the errors of their ways.
So, it would seem that unless someone opposes a Bill, the R's are going to vote for it. So, in my mind's eye, it would seem that unless the R's are told what to do, they can't think for themselves.
I will continue this opinion, until such time that the R's can prove me wrong.