cb51
Active Member
I've had this gun since 1972, and it's literally been all over the country with me. Living n Colorado and jeeping in the mountains, Canoe camping all up and down the Potomac river, and every road trip across the country. It even saved me and a girl friend from a wacko in a remote place. I can't begin to calculate how many thousands of rounds have been through it. It used to get shot every Saturday boring for about 15 years on the range. Then just plinking trips.
I've had other guns, and they all came and went. Just didn't bond with them. I even sold off my Smith and Wesson 617, it just didn't have the comfortable feel of the old Ruger.
But, am I deceiving myself and doing something a bit dangerous by continuing to use a gun over 40 years old?
It functions flawlessly, and shoots right to point of aim at 25 yards. I can actually shoot it better than the Ruger MK2 I bought in 1991 and kept for about 10 years before sending it down the road. Had to thick a front sight. The old standard has a nice thin front sight for a finer bead on odd targets like soda cans and tennis balls.
Retire or keep on shooting?
I've had other guns, and they all came and went. Just didn't bond with them. I even sold off my Smith and Wesson 617, it just didn't have the comfortable feel of the old Ruger.
But, am I deceiving myself and doing something a bit dangerous by continuing to use a gun over 40 years old?
It functions flawlessly, and shoots right to point of aim at 25 yards. I can actually shoot it better than the Ruger MK2 I bought in 1991 and kept for about 10 years before sending it down the road. Had to thick a front sight. The old standard has a nice thin front sight for a finer bead on odd targets like soda cans and tennis balls.
Retire or keep on shooting?