Brooklyn
I stand with John Locke.
I'm fully aware of the differences factually. Legally, they're not that different. Guns cost money. Should everyone get a free gun because it's in the constitution? My point is that you have to draw a line somewhere. The class is absolutely constitutional and is not prohibitively expensive. There isn't a good argument against that. Fingerprinting is the best argument but still shaky legally speaking. The government is allowed create regulations if they have reasons to do so. Public safety is easy here as they can prove that fingerprints help to identify criminals at crime scenes. They do not have the scientific data to show that concealed carry is a threat to public safety. Much stronger argument for us.
Since the purpose of registration was to prevent blacks from voting,we call that a clue.
On the bold that's just bull. There is no call,yet, to fingerprint everyone in case they commit a crime..if there were would it pass IS under the 4th Amendment? Since you are so found of public Saftey should you need a/licence to purchase alcohol, with DNA sample required in case someday you DWI and injure or kill someone? Would that pass IS?
The current training requirement does not ,by law, contain a performance standard and thus can not ,by definition,enhance public safety in any way,moreover there is no method to waive training based on a proof of prior training,only a set of class waivers based on crass political calculus and no offer of proof what so ever.. this belies the actual intent of the law..to keep marginal groups from excercising their rights...just like voter registration.
Of course today the democrats oppose the need to show proof of citizenship for voting, which is a proper execerise of government regulation, exactly because they intend to subvert the electoral process. And likewise they support regulation of guns,exactly because they used such regulation so effectively to keep blacks from voting..and now wish to keep them docile vitums of the criminal class that actually run the cities they claim to be "governing".
No true student of Macialvelli can miss this gambit.
And useing the work of the court that gave us dread Scott and Plessy as a guide to what is constutitional is to surrender the birthright of every Freeman. Locke supeceedes the Cour