Ab_Normal
Ab_member
My response from another thread:
If you really look at it, a frame or receiver by itself doesn't even meet the legal definition of a firearm UNTIL it is configured in a way that can expel a projectile. It says "the frame or receiver OF such a weapon" NOT something like 'the frame or receiver that can be used to make such a weapon'.
Granted the above definition is from Md law but I believe it is word for word the same as the feds. This would apply to 80% and 100% receivers.
This is NOT legal advice just food for thought at this time.
If you really look at it, a frame or receiver by itself doesn't even meet the legal definition of a firearm UNTIL it is configured in a way that can expel a projectile. It says "the frame or receiver OF such a weapon" NOT something like 'the frame or receiver that can be used to make such a weapon'.
(h) (1) “Firearm” means:
(i) a weapon that expels, is designed to expel, or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; or
(ii) the frame or receiver of such a weapon.
Granted the above definition is from Md law but I believe it is word for word the same as the feds. This would apply to 80% and 100% receivers.
This is NOT legal advice just food for thought at this time.