SOMDHoya
Member
- Jan 17, 2013
- 75
I recently found an article about a Florida sheriff whose deputy arrested a man for having a concealed firearm. When the sheriff came in he released the man and then destroyed the arrest documents so it looked like it never happened. Then the Florida governor decided to remove him from office. The reason for the removal was not the immediate release of the citizen but the destruction of the arrest record.
http://www.infowars.com/florida-sheriff-arrested-after-defending-second-amendment/
My question is this, is it possible for an elected County Sheriff to decide that he will not prosecute anyone who is arrested for having a concealed weapon? They could even take it a step further by saying that they will not prosecute any citizen for concealed carry if they have an out of state permit. That would ensure that they are not prosecuting law abiding citizens yet still getting trouble makers off of the street.
I know we have a lot of sheriffs around the state that are pro gun, and since the rest of us are held hostage by the likes of PG and Baltimore, this could be a way of giving us some of our constitutional rights out in the country.
What say you?
http://www.infowars.com/florida-sheriff-arrested-after-defending-second-amendment/
My question is this, is it possible for an elected County Sheriff to decide that he will not prosecute anyone who is arrested for having a concealed weapon? They could even take it a step further by saying that they will not prosecute any citizen for concealed carry if they have an out of state permit. That would ensure that they are not prosecuting law abiding citizens yet still getting trouble makers off of the street.
I know we have a lot of sheriffs around the state that are pro gun, and since the rest of us are held hostage by the likes of PG and Baltimore, this could be a way of giving us some of our constitutional rights out in the country.
What say you?