Obama wants to outlaw guns in 2nd term
- Thread starter Buck
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
kalister1
R.I.P.
The more fear that gets drummed up the more guns, primers, ammo,,,,,,, will sky rocket in price and disappear off the shelves. How many people have heard, "If it looks like Obummer is getting back in stock up quick before the mad rush" ?
Think about who stands to benefit from all the fear?
Think about who stands to benefit from all the fear?
Punchabearinnamouf
High Tech Redneck
On a side note; you guys need to stop talking about horses. You know what happens. 
As for the main subject, I figured that would be his plan from the beginning. He didn't want to make a big deal of it right away. Maybe it was so he could have a better chance at a second term. If he gets reelected I expect him to really show his agenda, gun control being a main point.
As for the main subject, I figured that would be his plan from the beginning. He didn't want to make a big deal of it right away. Maybe it was so he could have a better chance at a second term. If he gets reelected I expect him to really show his agenda, gun control being a main point.
Name Taken
Ultimate Member
We'll see baby steps on the federal front I believe.
They lost to much in 94 with the AWB and I doubt they'll drum up something that heavy right away.
To attack 2A I believe it's better to think like a Muslim terrorist. "They have the watches but we have the time".
They lost to much in 94 with the AWB and I doubt they'll drum up something that heavy right away.
To attack 2A I believe it's better to think like a Muslim terrorist. "They have the watches but we have the time".
lasher9999
Active Member
I believe the reason Obama was inactive on gun control in his first term is that he wanted to get reelected and he didn't want to hurt democratic standing in the house and senate.
The reelection reason will be gone in a second term. But as long as the house is republican there should be very little gun control passed. The real danger lies in who might get appointed to the Supreme Court in a second term.
Romney might be preferable to Obama on this, but I am not entirely sure. A Mass. Republican isn't much different than a democrat.
The reelection reason will be gone in a second term. But as long as the house is republican there should be very little gun control passed. The real danger lies in who might get appointed to the Supreme Court in a second term.
Romney might be preferable to Obama on this, but I am not entirely sure. A Mass. Republican isn't much different than a democrat.
Ab_Normal
Ab_member
Rattlesnake46319
Curmidget
Hynes57
Active Member
We this may get me zinged but that was an ignorant article. it was one man's opinion turned into "news". ...Of course Mr. LaPierre says this....its his job to! he can't go around and tell America a sitting Democrat is not going to take their guns. That could hurt recruitment! He cannot point out that a ton of the Dems in congress are gun lovers and would never allow our guns to get taken away. He can't alienate his political allies and especially not the industry leaders that send him kick backs every time an article by him scares the prices of ammo, guns, primers, etc...through the roof!(i had to add a little of my own tin hat to this thread too 
).
Give me an article that shows ACTUAL movement by the government to take my guns. Actual movement that has a chance in heck of passing. Do not send me state moves as i do not disagree that some state idiots are running rough shod over our 2A rights. Stop posting faux news to get everyone fired up.
As for the comments about "Libtards".....Well...just remember that us middle of the road voters will determine the future of the nation. I may be more liberal on some issues and more conservative on others but i am an ally in the fight for gun rights and you are a fool to alienate those like me.
).Give me an article that shows ACTUAL movement by the government to take my guns. Actual movement that has a chance in heck of passing. Do not send me state moves as i do not disagree that some state idiots are running rough shod over our 2A rights. Stop posting faux news to get everyone fired up.
As for the comments about "Libtards".....Well...just remember that us middle of the road voters will determine the future of the nation. I may be more liberal on some issues and more conservative on others but i am an ally in the fight for gun rights and you are a fool to alienate those like me.
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
We this may get me zinged but that was an ignorant article. it was one man's opinion turned into "news". ...Of course Mr. LaPierre says this....its his job to! he can't go around and tell America a sitting Democrat is not going to take their guns. That could hurt recruitment! He cannot point out that a ton of the Dems in congress are gun lovers and would never allow our guns to get taken away. He can't alienate his political allies and especially not the industry leaders that send him kick backs every time an article by him scares the prices of ammo, guns, primers, etc...through the roof!(i had to add a little of my own tin hat to this thread too
Give me an article that shows ACTUAL movement by the government to take my guns. Actual movement that has a chance in heck of passing. Do not send me state moves as i do not disagree that some state idiots are running rough shod over our 2A rights. Stop posting faux news to get everyone fired up.
As for the comments about "Libtards".....Well...just remember that us middle of the road voters will determine the future of the nation. I may be more liberal on some issues and more conservative on others but i am an ally in the fight for gun rights and you are a fool to alienate those like me.
Norton's comment is right on. We have enough to worry about here in the PRofMD. But, as this state goes, so does the country, especially when you have 2nd term liberal-left heads-of-state with agendas ... Just look at the number of ill-conceived, and anti-2A bills that have been brought forward this session, and all probabaly introduced, or at least encouraged at Owe'Malleys behest.
It's no secret that Obamarx would like to 'curtail' 2A, so LaPierre's comments, while self-serving, aren't that far off of the mark. Harking back to The One's 2008 comment, "clinging to their guns and religion', and putting it in the context of today's kerfuffle with 1A, could 2A be too far off if he gets re-elected ?
Food for thought ...
You would think that but he has already side stepped Congress Twice.
It would make perfect sense for Obamarx to do this. Why do you think most of Obamacare does'nt start till next year? He had to put off the real damage till after he gets reelected with billions going to ACORN or whatever they call themselves to make shure every dead,illegal,pet,child,and Disney character gets out to vote for Obamarx. The ground work is laid. He has the authority to round up and imprison anyone he wants to without charge. He has sloshed trillions aside for any contingencies and a media willing to villify anyone who gets in his way. We ARE one justice away from essentially nullifying the Constitution in actuality. Currently the SCOTUS has been unwilling to accept any case that would result in any meaningfull decision regarding our God Given Rights. We see how genuinely effective Heller amd MacDonald have been.(what a joke) I hope they lump the registration bill in with the other gun bills but it would be like them to make us take another day off to come testify.
Well, he is technically right about that. Although they can be used for recreational shooting, self defense or hunting, their real purpose is to project lethality. To provide a means to kill those which are a danger - either to an individual Citizen or to a Nation as a whole.
Just like every other firearm in history.
And I am comfortable with that.
I have a several fire extinguishers placed throughout my home. They are there for suppressing fires, because fires are dangerous and destructive.
I own guns because tyranny is even more dangerous and destructive than fire.
Just like his son, MOM
- Nov 14, 2010
- 20,274
+1
I don't have a problem with that line of thought at all. I, like many others, feel it in my bones.
Maybe Bill Whittle needs to 'school' him ...
I don't have a problem with that line of thought at all. I, like many others, feel it in my bones.
Maybe Bill Whittle needs to 'school' him ...
boricuamaximus
Ultimate Member
- Dec 27, 2008
- 6,237
Again, no new president will touch guns on their first term. We need to unite against whoever is going against the current prez. So we can vote for principles but we might just end up throwing votes away and we're screwed for 4 years.
I want Ron Paul. It's not going to happen. We need to minimize the damage by voting out the current and waiting till 2016 until someone that's decent runs.
Is there information on MSI? Information for contacting our reps? Thanks for the heads-up.
- Status
Users who are viewing this thread
Forum statistics
Latest threads
-
-
-
-
Judge says Delaware vanity plate (FCANCER/FJB/LGB) rules allow viewpoint discrimination (1 Viewer)- Started by RFBfromDE
- Replies: 2
-
-
-