vwluv10338
Active Member
- Jan 13, 2009
- 393
I realllllllllllllly hope they don't screw up my MAC again over the SBR BS. I don't think I could stomach it again
I thought I read a thread that said the MD related stuff was going to one examiner because of all the Bravo Sierra associated with the MD law. That would only make it worse if numerous examiners are doing this, unless it's approved because they don't know better.
Maybe not.
Form 3s are taking forever too. Last one took 8 weeks. The NFA branch is a mess.
My last Form 3 took 5.5 weeks. Which in my opinion it should only take three weeks, tops! SilencerShop I find is a good pulse for the timelines of Form 3's and trust Form 4's. They're tracking about 5-7 weeks for From 3's right now.
Date of application was June 13.
Date of denial was December 14.
6 months, almost to the day.
Yeah, this sux and is a PITA. I'll update folks on this as I progress.
I'm pretty slammed at work right now so I'm not sure I'll be able to turn to this until after the New Year (as others have pointed out, these gov guys are probably on leave until then anyway).
Thanks all!
6 months on a Form 1 is total BS. Was it a paper submission by any chance?
This is silencershop. 8.5 weeks.
Well, I guess I should expect my form 4 to get denied then. ATF cashed my $200 check yesterday and I submitted for an AAC MPW OAL 29.5". I still have hope though...
Well, I guess I should expect my form 4 to get denied then. ATF cashed my $200 check yesterday and I submitted for an AAC MPW OAL 29.5". I still have hope though...
They are going to kick that F4 back.
ok, I think that's a huge possibility, but are you basing that from the recent kick backs or the fact that the firearm isn't on the handgun roster? because even the recent kick backs were on the handgun roster according to the poster. I'm just looking for some info that says the atf approval is based on the handgun roster. I'm not even arguing the fact that it must eventually be on the roster, just the atf part.
Oh and I hope your wrong... 99.9% for the reason that I get the firearm sooner than later, .1% so I can say you were wrong
baby in hand, typing with the other, sorry for any misspelling
ATF will consider that when approving a Form 4
I understand the MD laws on SBRs = handguns. I'm asking whether you can reference something that shows the ATF is using the handgun roster as a reference. I'm not disputing that the firearm must eventually be on the handgun roster before it goes home. I'm not even going to dispute the "breaking MD law" part either, but what are you referencing when you say that the ATF will consider the handgun roster? Obviously both need to happen, again, just asking what your reference is to show which must happen first. This would be helpful so I can actually reference something tangible to my dealer besides "the guy on the forums said it, so it must be true". help me out...
ok, I think that's a huge possibility, but are you basing that from the recent kick backs or the fact that the firearm isn't on the handgun roster? because even the recent kick backs were on the handgun roster according to the poster. I'm just looking for some info that says the atf approval is based on the handgun roster. I'm not even arguing the fact that it must eventually be on the roster, just the atf part.
Oh and I hope your wrong... 99.9% for the reason that I get the firearm sooner than later, .1% so I can say you were wrong
baby in hand, typing with the other, sorry for any misspelling