WeaponsCollector
EXTREME GUN OWNER
I'm just wondering when is MSP going to send out teams of inspectors armed with magnifying glasses and calipers to check everyone's rifle barrels to make sure they aren't the evil banned ones?
I'm just wondering when is MSP going to send out teams of inspectors armed with magnifying glasses and calipers to check everyone's rifle barrels to make sure they aren't the evil banned ones?
I'm just wondering when is MSP going to send out teams of inspectors armed with magnifying glasses and calipers to check everyone's rifle barrels to make sure they aren't the evil banned ones?
I'm just wondering when is MSP going to send out teams of inspectors armed with magnifying glasses and calipers to check everyone's rifle barrels to make sure they aren't the evil banned ones?
They've just signed a contract with NACAR. They are going to local ranges to impound your AR's and SBR's, send them to North Carolina where they will be measured or disassembled to count 922R parts.
SBRs are GTG AFIK
I think we misunderstood each other. I was making a point that SBR's are subject to the imported parts count. Skinny barrels on SBR's are fine
If we get a good outcome on the Kolbe appeal, I wonder what the backlog will be on AR-15's the first couple months, and how much FFL transfer fees in MD will rocket to.
If we get a good outcome on the Kolbe appeal, I wonder what the backlog will be on AR-15's the first couple months, and how much FFL transfer fees in MD will rocket to.
Bad logic. The problem is "is the configuration legal?", not "are the parts legal"? There's really no such thing as a banned part in MD. I could own an SP-89 parts kit including the receiver, but I haven't violated any laws until I build it.what's to prevent someone from simply taking the upper off and putting it on any AR lower? If the rifle is MD legal than that means the barrel is MD legal right?
I could own an SP-89 parts kit including the receiver, but I haven't violated any laws until I build it.
Eh, be careful with that thought. That can be called constructive intent and can get you in trouble. The feds catch people on NFA violations that way.
Bad logic. The problem is "is the configuration legal?", not "are the parts legal"? There's really no such thing as a banned part in MD. I could own an SP-89 parts kit including the receiver, but I haven't violated any laws until I build it.