DL should have no indication of your firearm license. YOUR ADDRESS is on it. A lost permit tells the criminal right where to go for a firearm or two.
sorry
You might want to have Judge Legg's decision in your hip pocket, to let them know their actions are unconstitutional.
Be prepared for the condescending attitude from the carry permit review board.
DL should have no indication of your firearm license. YOUR ADDRESS is on it. A lost permit tells the criminal right where to go for a firearm or two.
sorry
Threeband said:Patrick's idea was basically Constitutional Carry.
Everybody's driver's license would be a carry permit, unless a 5 minute NCIS-type background check revealed them to be a Prohibited Person.
So all those Suburban Million Soccer Mom Brady Huggers would have carry permits. Franciscan Friars would have carry permits. Most people would have carry permits, even if they were wild-eyed "Melt-'em-all-down!" Antis.
In Wyoming, your proof of Wyoming residency is your carry permit. This would be almost the same, except it would reveal to everybody who had a Prohibiting arrest record, psych history, etc. And there I see a problem.
Your address is on the carry permit also.
DL should have no indication of your firearm license. YOUR ADDRESS is on it. A lost permit tells the criminal right where to go for a firearm or two.
sorry
But why double the possibility? I don't always carry my 4 permits with me. Some guys only carry the permit if they are carrying, so if you are carrying your permit and not carrying, there are more guns at your residence. Why risk the extra exposure?
BTW my FL permit has no address on it. That makes some sense to me
I don't see the issue. A lost DL tells them where to find a CAR (presumably worth more than your gun)
You might want to have Judge Legg's decision in your hip pocket, to let them know their actions are unconstitutional.
Be prepared for the condescending attitude from the carry permit review board.
I don't see the issue. A lost DL tells them where to find a CAR (presumably worth more than your gun)
The problem is, (And who can blame them) If the MSP puppets do not play ball they will loose their jobs. Ask Ed Norris.
A car can't be started without a key. A gun sure can. I'm not taking a side, but I think using a system where prohibited people would be flagged would be just fine.
That's where the creative thinking part came in. I've never been accused of thinking INSIDE the box.
If I understand this correctly, a stay allows them to temporarily return to processing as to prior Woollard. It does not indicate that the G&S clause has magically been deemed constitutional all of a sudden, just that they have permission to process under the broken system while developing a process that does not violate 2A.
Maybe the review board will see that US Constitutional rights spelled out in 2A ARE being denied by this process, and realizing that the system is broken, will rule favorable to our rights irregardless of the G&S clause.
Keep in mind that the review board can deny you under the current rules of the game. Asking for a review does one big thing, though: it uses the process afforded you to the fullest extent of the law. If you stop before all the hurdles are finished, then you give up chance of appeal after the ruling is upheld/stay is lifted.
DDOS the HrB.I also bet that if enough people went with the administrative appeal, at least some people would win by dint of the timeframe allowed. No idea what kind of 'win' this would be, but it would be interesting. And a ddos on the board would be good for a laugh.