Trbo6gn
Ultimate Member
So when is MSI filing a lawsuit on our behalf?
Don't get me started....
So when is MSI filing a lawsuit on our behalf?
So when is MSI filing a lawsuit on our behalf?
So when is MSI filing a lawsuit on our behalf?
As good a reason as they are going to get. Though I can see some places viewing this as an opportunity to make more money by selling training classes, fingerprints and photographs.
I hate to say "I told you so" but...........
If there is any good to be seen in this, at least it's possible that this additional outrageous denial of accessibility to a constitutional right might be enough to tip the balance in favor of an injunction.
Absolutely. In fact, I think one ffl I have a transfer with might be in this group. IMO, we need to punish the businesses which look to profit from our rights being infringed by supporting those who do not with our business.
I think we need to swamp them with HQL apps! A right delayed is a right denied!
I think we need to swamp them with HQL apps! A right delayed is a right denied!
First ever post...from Baltimore...but this got me especially p'd off.
What if people in the squeeze went to their FFL's (those not releasing on time) and said: I'll take possession of the gun then give it right back to you so your gunsmith, etc. can have a look at it. That way, you've taken possession, but they have no fear of letting some bad guy out on the street with a weapon. You still might have some FFL's who say NO, but some might say yes. Then, you've got legal possession (and avoid HQL) but they aren't risking an armed (should be declined) idiot walking out the door.
The law creates a distinction (which is referenced in this Opinion).
As such, the answer cannot be the same.