Frosh May Get Froshed

Mark75H · Mar 8, 2016

If you do the behind the scenes research, you see that it goes way back before Frosh, Moseby and SRB.

What changed was they tried to have some Stingray data admitted as court evidence because they didn't have anything else. Basically the whole thing blew up in their faces.

They've been illegally using this type of device since O'Malley was mayor; Frosh, SRB et al simply inherited this from their predicessors.

Jim12 · Mar 8, 2016

Mark75H said:
If you do the behind the scenes research, you see that it goes way back before Frosh, Moseby and SRB.

What changed was they tried to have some Stingray data admitted as court evidence because they didn't have anything else. Basically the whole thing blew up in their faces.

They've been illegally using this type of device since O'Malley was mayor.

Aha!!

That's their secret to keeping Baltimore's crime rate so low! :sarcasm:

Z_Man · Mar 8, 2016

Mark75H said:
If you do the behind the scenes research, you see that it goes way back before Frosh, Moseby and SRB.

What changed was they tried to have some Stingray data admitted as court evidence because they didn't have anything else. Basically the whole thing blew up in their faces.

They've been illegally using this type of device since O'Malley was mayor; Frosh, SRB et al simply inherited this from their predicessors.

the only difference is in the past they would drop cases if the only evidence they had was stingray data, because they didn't want to let the public know it even existed, nevermind they were using it.

they would use the stingray to fish, and when they caught someone, would then backfill other evidence, or get a confession. in cases they only had stingray data, they would rather drop them then put on the public record they were using the device.

motorcoachdoug · Mar 8, 2016

If Frosh did tell the police to use it and that they did not need a warrant when one was needed then could charges be brought against him and under Article 5 of the MD Constitution he could be removed.

ComeGet · Mar 8, 2016

motorcoachdoug said:
If Frosh did tell the police to use it and that they did not need a warrant when one was needed then could charges be brought against him and under Article 5 of the MD Constitution he could be removed.

So, who would have to initiate that?

The GA?

Woo hoo. I needed a good laugh.

Mark75H · Mar 8, 2016

motorcoachdoug said:
If Frosh did tell the police to use it and that they did not need a warrant when one was needed then could charges be brought against him and under Article 5 of the MD Constitution he could be removed.

No, Frosh has almost nothing to do with Stingray use.

Another invented mountain where there isn't even a molehill. You guys are tilting at windmills.

motorcoachdoug · Mar 9, 2016

Ok then I stand corrected. I was thinking anyway if he did do such a thing. Hey one can hope ......

sonoramic · Mar 10, 2016

Boom Boom said:
It's a federal felony if done without a warrant.

Doesn't matter, all of the recordings were on Hillarys email server.

sonoramic · Mar 10, 2016

swinokur said:
yep-family resemblance
.

Also.....

EL1227 · Apr 5, 2016

Make this the Frosh thread for all things

MD's domestic enemy NEEDS to go down. Document his dirty deeds here for all to see and use against him. He has aspirations as governor, so it's not to early to make sure he never gets close. Alinsky Rule #5 applied 'liberally' (pun intended) :innocent0

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

From today's headlines ...

16 Democrat AGs Begin Inquisition Against ‘Climate Change Disbelievers’

EL1227 · Apr 5, 2016

Looks like the Frosh has aligned with the same group of AG tyrants for gun control too. They're circling their wagons ...

EL1227 · Apr 5, 2016

This sign ...

mrgnstrn · Apr 5, 2016

The problem with this particular headline in terms of ridicule...the "progressives" (maybe a better term is "regressives") welcome censorship.
they don't love the 1st amendment, they hate that it gives citizens the right to hold views that are in opposition to theirs.
they welcome the gov't "cracking" down on these though crimes.
so it's not very ridiculous....to them.
we need something even more salacious.
maybe he's listed in the DC Madam's black book?

EL1227 said:
MD's domestic enemy NEEDS to go down. Document his dirty deeds here for all to see and use against him. He has aspirations as governor, so it's not to early to make sure he never gets close. Alinsky Rule #5 applied 'liberally' (pun intended)

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

From today's headlines ...

16 Democrat AGs Begin Inquisition Against ‘Climate Change Disbelievers’

EL1227 · Apr 5, 2016

mrgnstrn said:
The problem with this particular headline in terms of ridicule...the "progressives" (maybe a better term is "regressives") welcome censorship.
they don't love the 1st amendment, they hate that it gives citizens the right to hold views that are in opposition to theirs.
they welcome the gov't "cracking" down on these though crimes.
so it's not very ridiculous....to them.
we need something even more salacious.
maybe he's listed in the DC Madam's black book?

Or has 'offshore holdings' a la the Panama Papers.

foxtrapper · Apr 5, 2016

Bohlieve410 said:
Nothing shocks me anymore about a guy who actively protected pedophiles. Just lookup his opposition to Jessica's law.

When I was very young, probably just under 2. I was being babysat by some "older" lady and I was always very upset and fussing to my parents about having to be with her. Even when I was 5 or 6 I couldn't recall what it was. We lived in PG pretty near the county lines ( I was born in Takoma Park- I've made quite a 360). Frosh would have been mid 20's maybe then? I wonder if he was the baby sitter's relation and hung around with her? What made me so upset? Did I get Froshed as a toddler?

Oh, if only someone could find some pedophile dirt on ol Froshy! Is he creepy uncle Froshy?

Rack&Roll · Apr 5, 2016

You're having a froshback.

Of course, there's no reality, truth or facts connected to froshbacks, so you are good to go.

Mike · Apr 6, 2016

EL1227 said:
Or has 'offshore holdings' a la the Panama Papers.

Apparently not likely:

Perhaps oddly, though, missing from the list of names are any officials from the United States or any known criminal enterprises known to operate in the U.S.

What's more, according to Breitbart News, the leak of the Panama Papers was facilitated, in part, by a group funded by billionaire George Soros, as the mainstream media focuses primarily on the connection of several of the individuals to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

http://www.naturalnews.com/053551_Panama_Papers_United_States_government_political_propaganda.html#

N3YMY · Apr 9, 2016

Z_Man said:
they would use the stingray to fish, and when they caught someone, would then backfill other evidence, or get a confession. in cases they only had stingray data, they would rather drop them then put on the public record they were using the device.

You mean like this?

Yet when lawyers on both sides of the isle are questioned about the legality of this practice, they say it's not legal system and can't believe cases have gone to court using it!

Nice :mad54:

Tomcat · Apr 19, 2016

Wonder if he's tied up in this? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/04/18/ags-activists-accused-collusion-on-exxon-probe-amid-new-emails.html?intcmp=hplnws AGs, activists accused of 'collusion' on Exxon probe amid new emails.

What caught my eyes was this

In the end, it seems the only parties that may be breaking the law are those colluding AGs in their scheme to silence political opposition, while seeking funds for their preferred policy agenda,”

Sounds about like him

Tomcat · Apr 19, 2016

Looks like he is tied up in it
http://eelegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Master-VT-OAG-docs-of-note.pdf

Might need some signs out front of his office?

Frosh May Get Froshed

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

MD Wear&Carry Instructor

Let Freedom Ring

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

Ultimate Member

MD Wear&Carry Instructor

Ultimate Member

Charlie dont surf.

Charlie dont surf.

R.I.P.

Attachments

R.I.P.

R.I.P.

Attachments

Active Member

R.I.P.

Ultimate Member

R.I.P

Propietario de casa, Toluca, México

Ultimate Member

Formerly Known As HITWTOM

Formerly Known As HITWTOM

Users who are viewing this thread

Log in

Forum statistics