Absolutly nothing our state officials do could surprise me. After all it's for our own good.
Considering 75% of MD voters are completely too ignorant for Rights they seriously think so.
Absolutly nothing our state officials do could surprise me. After all it's for our own good.
Welcome to the forum. We need your help.
I think this is one to file away until we get more info.
I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to move as early as possible once the session starts, but that shouldn't be a shocker to anyone. I haven't heard one way or the other if that is the plan though.
If the constituents are not aware of a bill, how can they tell their reps what they want? After all, the representatives are very interested in the will of the people they govern.
Excellent video link, Minuteman. I re-posted this to another (and predominantly liberal) forum. Those folks would just scoff at the information if it was less reasonably presented. But you can't so easily dismiss this kind of level-headed fact-based presentation. Need to see more of this, folks.
(emphasis mine)It got me thinking, so I looked for myself.
In 2011, two people in Maryland were murdered with a rifle, two.
Three people were murdered with a shotgun, 75 were murdered with a knife or other cutting instrument and 17 people were murdered by someone's bare hands.
FBI Uniform Crime Report, Murder by State, Types of Weapons, 2011
Facts are facts.
what do you guys make of this. I just pulled it off the MD legislature. Seems like they want to open the concealed carry before they lose in the 4th appeals
any update on when we should have a hearing from the 4th appeals
what do you guys make of this. I just pulled it off the MD legislature. Seems like they want to open the concealed carry before they lose in the 4th appeals
what do you guys make of this. I just pulled it off the MD legislature. Seems like they want to open the concealed carry before they lose in the 4th appeals
From the PDF page 3:
has good and substantial reason to wear, carry, or transport 11 a handgun, such as a finding that the permit is necessary as a reasonable precaution 12 against apprehended danger].
Here we go again G&S needed. Or am I reading this wrong?
Square brackets = proposed removal from statute.
Bold text = proposed addition to statute.
Square brackets = proposed removal from statute.
Bold text = proposed addition to statute.