"In common use"

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    :mad54:
    The evidence to refute the judge's contention is readily available from the State Police. Their records indicate there are, what, probably over 100,000 ARs & AKs registered in Maryland. (I don't remember the actual number, too tired to look it up right now.) The MSP also reports a whopping ZERO crimes involving the use of an AR or AK. That means that 100,000 (or whatever the actual number is) of these rifles ALREADY ARE possessed in Maryland for lawful purposes.

    I did cringe a little bit when the judge asked our side to cite home defense uses of banned rifles, and Sweeny didn't have a good answer. If something similar to what I wrote above wasn't included in the package sent to this judge, it should make interesting reading for the appeals court.

    That's because the question makes no sense. Its as if the only proof a gun is used in self defense is a body count.. if the gun is hot in your house its in use.

    It was like hearing the judge count to lemon and ask us to give the next number.. ;)
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,848
    Messages
    7,298,331
    Members
    33,530
    Latest member
    roth405

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom