Regarding your "need" for a firearm

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Minuteman

    Member
    BANNED!!!
    John Farnam is a former Marine, life long firearms instructor, part time philosopher, and living legend.

    Almost everyday he pontificates, and emails anyone who signs up for his daily posts, which he calls 'quips' (meaning, things that bug him). He has given permission to repost (not for profit) his quips; just do right and credit him. Encourage folks to visit his website, he (and his cadre of trusted instructors) provide training on the range and now he also has an excellent selection of instructional videos available online. Some are free.

    Here is today's post:


    28 Apr 16

    Sounding like a typical Democrat politician, an editorialist in VA recently
    said:

    “I grew up shooting shotguns and rifles with my grandfather..,”

    “I understand why people want firearms...,”

    Then comes the inevitable punch-line:

    “I do not believe, however, that there is any legitimate reason for
    ordinary citizens to own military-grade weapons..., yet these are somehow legal
    to be bought and to own.”

    “Ordinary?” He must be talking about all those “regular” Americans who
    are proudly self-reliant and want to be able to effectively defend
    themselves from armed criminals.

    “Military-grade weapons” is a broad phrase. He would obviously ban
    Beretta 92F, and 1911-style pistols if he could.

    My guns aren’t “somehow legal.” They ARE legal, and I don’t need the
    condescending “approval” of some leftist elitist to keep them!

    But wait! There’s more:

    “An AR-15 makes a lousy self-defense weapon, unless you are worried about
    guerillas invading your home...”

    Actually, that is exactly what I’m worried about, and an AR/M4 makes a
    superb defensive weapon! I suspect this naive liberal editorialist has never
    so much as touched one, or he would not make such stupid statements.

    And finally this:

    “My rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are threatened
    every day by the presence of military-grade weapons in the hands of untrained
    or, in a worst-case scenario, violent people.”

    Of course, like all leftists, he never gets specific. He cannot describe
    a single incident in which he, personally, has ever been threatened by a “
    untrained person” with an AR, nor any other kind of firearm for that matter.
    The “threats” he describes are all theoretical, but his condescending
    contempt for his follow countrymen is all too apparent.

    The foregoing is a good summary of the messages we’re hearing from the
    mouths of Democrats during this election year.

    They first try to sooth us by claiming some vague acknowledgment of our
    Second Amendment, even claiming to have “... gone shooting with my grandfather,
    ” ad nauseam.

    They then insist that we lowly “ordinary” citizens don’t “need” certain
    currently-legal guns that are widely owned by “ordinary” Americans across
    the County. The fact that we don’t “need” them is then complete
    justification for banning them, at least from the hands of all “ordinary” citizens.

    Curiously, their proposed bans never apply to them!

    These are the same leftist elitists who insist that we “ordinary”
    Americans don’t “need” a boat, nor a house with a view, nor an SUV. Their narrow
    definition of “need” apparently defines our individual rights and
    liberties.

    Of course, their personal “need” for all these things is always legitimate
    and must never be questioned!

    These self-proclaimed “ruling elitists” make me sick!

    They piously claim moral superiority, putting themselves far above all of
    us disgusting peons, who just can’t be trusted with lethal weapons. All
    the while, they of course, “deserve” a host of special rights (including gun
    rights) and privileges not available to the rest of us.

    And, they want us to vote for them!

    “Who claims a ‘clear conscience’ is without fail, a frightful bore”

    Anon

    /John





    _______________________________________________
    John Farnam's Quips mailing list
    JSFarnam@aol.com
    Copyright 2016 by DTI, Inc. All rights reserved.
     
    Last edited:

    jc1240

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Sep 18, 2013
    15,016
    Westminster, MD
    <insert animated GIF of tuxedo-wearing fella clapping here>

    I'm immediately reminded of Bama's new sweatshirt that I oh so want.
     

    eruby

    Confederate Jew
    MDS Supporter
    <insert animated GIF of tuxedo-wearing fella clapping here>

    I'm immediately reminded of Bama's new sweatshirt that I oh so want.

    v8Y1VvbEma2efk3vWvg3NmQm_400.gif
     

    JohnnyE

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 18, 2013
    9,694
    MoCo
    <insert animated GIF of tuxedo-wearing fella clapping here>

    I'm immediately reminded of Bama's new sweatshirt that I oh so want.

    That's not a "fella" clapping, that's Orson Welles, in Citizen Kane.
     

    ras_oscar

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 23, 2014
    1,669
    In order to adopt a firearm for deployment, the military issues a set of operational requirements. Providers develop prototype weapons that are rigorously tested to assure the soldiers in the field are provided with a product that will perform under all conditions that are reasonably expected to be encountered, at the best value to the Government. Those tests and rugged reliability, accuracy and value that result from the process are precisely why those firearms are preferred also by many law enforcement agencies and sportsmen.
     

    ras_oscar

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 23, 2014
    1,669
    Once the precedent is established that a need test can be applied to a constitutional right, none of the constitutional rights mean anything.
     

    highli99

    Ultimate Member
    Nov 10, 2015
    2,551
    West Side
    "Military" just means cheap and reliable. In every age there have been guns better or more effective than the arms carried by average soldiers in the best army's of the time.
     
    Feb 28, 2013
    28,953
    Never heard of 'im 'til now.

    But I like 'im after readin' that.

    Now to git back to offendin' fudds from VA with my God given rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of "military style assault weapons".
     

    pcfixer

    Ultimate Member
    May 24, 2009
    5,962
    Marylandstan
    Please don't tell me what I need or want. American's are "Born Free"! People can advocate whatever then want, please don't pass judgement on me
    because I want to own and can own military grade or military style firearms. By definition a police state and very tyrannical. PERIOD.
     

    pcfixer

    Ultimate Member
    May 24, 2009
    5,962
    Marylandstan
    BTW, As far as We and I say American patriots should be concerned this 'need' is resolved already by case law in Heller and Caetano.

    The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitutebearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”District of Columbia v.Heller 554 U. S. 570, 582 (2008)

     

    EL1227

    R.I.P.
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 14, 2010
    20,274
    Farnam was speaking about a politician in Virginia, but he could have just as easily been talking about any one of the liberal/progressive elitists anywhere in America, including right here in the PRofMD ...

    Like Chris Van Hollen, Donna Edwards, Rushern Baker, or Brian Frosh ...

     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,871
    Messages
    7,299,385
    Members
    33,534
    Latest member
    illlocs33

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom