I had reserved judgment until the above statement was made. As a Police Officer we will encounter those that don’t want our help but in fact need our help. “Maybe that crack head down the street will be able to help you.” Is not a comment I would expect to hear from one that is sworn to...
So basically they did what they wanted to do? Not what the law required? If this is the case we are in big trouble. They are appointed for life and can make their own rules as they see fit.
I was so wrong. That’s why IANALOJ. I feel bad for those that can’t protect themselves and family by carrying. It just does not feel like they gave it any thought at all. I have never seen the courts make a decision so quick.
No. What would happen to apps that they received after the say is lifted on the 8th to the 15th if the CA4 then issued a stay at that time was my question. I had an idea just wanted to get others opinions.
Some people ask questions (myself included) to better understand the issues at hand. As well as the court system decision making process altogether. If you ask no question you will get no answer. So I ask all to ask away so we may all improve in knowledge.
I edited my post. I was trying to get an idea of what would happen if the CA4 is not prepared to rule by the 7th but ruled on the 15th what would happen to the apps sent in prior to the 15th. sorry I was not clear.
Question, if the CA4 is not prepared to rule by the 7th do you think all application postmarked on that date will be reviewed with no G&S? Or if they rule on the say 15 what would happen to all apps received prior too?