I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more attention here (maybe it has and I missed the thread)... The long standing question about building a lower purchased prior to 10-1-13 into a now banned config is legal...
As you've stated, you're no authority. We need someone with authority to clarify. Just based on the small sampling of responses to this tread, it's obvious that there are differing opinions, and differing opinions can lead to problems.
Yes, I know this it a hotly contested debate, and I would rather not get into with this thread. With that said, what's the chance now that Hogan has appointed Pallozzi as MSP Superintendent, we can finally get clarification on the legality of building a pre-Oct 2013 lower into a non-hbar upper...
I currently have a pre-Oct '13 lower with a stock. I read that MSP may now consider the build date and not the date of the lower purchased when deciding if a firearm is legal. With that being said, can anyone recommend any HBAR uppers that would make my rifle "MD legal"?
Just double-checking, would this upper be legal on a pre Oct 2013 purchased lower?
http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-SS410-16-Mid-Length-Upper-Receiver-Group-p/bcm-urg-mid16%20ss410.htm
I've found some older posts stating that it's completely legal to purchase a non-banned rifle out of state and bring it back. Is this still the case post SB281?