The case, McKay v. Hutchens, is at the 9th circuit. It is however, stayed pending resolution of not just Peruta, but also U.S. v. Chovan, Richards v. Prieto and Baker v. Kealoha.
Peruta has been decided, as has Choven. Both parties in Richards have filed 28J letters in regards to both Choven...
I now think the tip-off was the day before, when Orange County revised their procedures to accept self defense as good cause.
This most likely will moot the case, McKay v. Hutchinson (Sheriff of O.C.), which is before the 9th and is stayed, pending the outcome of Peruta, Richards and Baker...
I keep hearing all this crap about Heller and McDonald "squeaking" by with a mere 5/4 win...
Fact is that all 9 Justices were in agreement that the 2A was an individual right. We get the 5/4 split in whether or not the right meant anything.
Kcbrown, do a little research and inform yourself of...
We have almost quit following this case. A lot has happened since 2011.
It has been up to the DCCA once before and sent back down to the District. Again, the District ruled against Dearth and is now back up to the DCCA. Here is the summary at the Internet Archive. And here is an incomplete...
The docket at the Internet Archive has been updated.
http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.mdd.254564/gov.uscourts.mdd.254564.docket.html
And I've made available the Third Amended Complaint. More, later as I'm off to work, just now.
30
Yes it is. Try tracking all the cases that I do, if you want to throw away money! :D
I've lost track of this case, and haven't placed it on my list. sigh. I'll try and remedy that situation as soon as time allows.
All briefs for cases granted cert may be found at the ABA site. Abramski briefs are here: http://www.americanbar.org/publications/preview_home/12-1493.html
The case, as decided at the District Court, applied only to the defendant and only to a specific location in CO.
The USPS is foolish (IMO) to push this into the Appellate Court. An adverse ruling (adverse to the USPS) may very well open up all public parking areas within the 10th Circuit...
The docket noted in the earlier post (back on page 1) is now incorrect. The PACER case number was changed. The correct docket may be found here: http://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.caed.233362/gov.uscourts.caed.233362.docket.html
This is only the first challenge. The case has...