Fox123
Ultimate Member
just watched the video as well, they confirmed this. My bad.
FTFY...You're right...I would adjust to my new "ragged" exterior.
Of course, this is not about cost. It's about having a pistol that the soft fascists don't know about.Too expensive, really. I can buy a Timberwolf frame for $235 with everything in it. Yeah, that involves a transfer, but it's not like Glock parts kits are a dime a dozen.
Yup....Of course, this is not about cost. It's about having a pistol that the soft fascists don't know about.
On another note, I thought they already had an ATF determination letter on it.
Until they seize all of the sales and shipping records from these guys... in which case, they do. I am skeptical that, short of an anonymous cash-only face to face transaction, that you can really hide this from the federal government.Of course, this is not about cost. It's about having a pistol that the soft fascists don't know about.
In general you are correct. In the case of the Glock, the locking block pulls the bbl down and out of battery (unlocking), and stops it's rearward progression so action can open. For the Glock, the locking block endures most of the strain that would normally be transferred to the frame. This is why the bbl, slide, and locking block make up the bulk of the steel components.Seems pretty awesome to me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the job of the lower is to keep the slide from hitting you in the face, and most of the explosion is contained in the barrel and breech yes? Not that this is an argument for under engineered pistols, but that this frame would be mixed with proven components in critical areas, yes?
I'm a bit disappointed. I thought they ere going to making a 1911 frame. I would have been more interested in that.
On another note, I thought they already had an ATF determination letter on it.
There is a metric butt load of good AR an 1911 80% options. To my knowledge this is the only 80% Glock.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk