Ulysses S. Grant's Remington Revolvers to be Auctioned in May 2022

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • WatTyler

    Ultimate Member
    I only hope the provenance of the Russian revolvers was researched a little more thoroughly than the F&S writeup, since Nicholas II was born five years after the referenced 1863 fleet visit.
     

    smokey

    2A TEACHER
    Jan 31, 2008
    31,524
    Why can I picture some rich dweeb like Bloomberg buying then and then melting them down
     

    Darkemp

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 18, 2009
    7,811
    Marylandistan
    I’d say the collector who bought them in 1976 for $1500 did alright although he didn’t live to see the fruits of his purchase. I guess $1,000,000.
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,090

    Blacksmith101

    Grumpy Old Man
    Jun 22, 2012
    22,286
    In 2002, at Christie’s Americana Auction House, the Lafayette/Washington pistols were sold for a whopping $1,986,000 to a local Pennsylvania foundation. The foundation purchased them in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the French and Indian War—and in recognition of the critical role that Washington played, not only in that war, but in the birth of our democracy. In the spring of 2004, the foundation donated the pistols to the Fort Ligonier Museum in Ligonier, Pa., to be on display as part of the museum’s “Washington Collection.”

    https://www.americanrifleman.org/content/the-lafayette-washington-pistols/
     

    SmokeEaterPilot

    Active Member
    Jun 3, 2011
    525
    This is a terribly interesting auction. I'll set the provenance aside (because it's simply awsome).

    Everything I read about Grant and seeing these revolvers almost seem a stark contrast from one another.

    Grant (aside from being probably the best General of the ACW) he was also very simple and sometimes elected the most basic of solutions to a problem. When West Point admissions got his name wrong on the rooster, he simply changed his name. Seige of Vicksburg was not terribly complicated, he remarked to "out-camp" the enemy. When he met Lee for terms of surrender, Lee put on his nicest uniform and Grant simply wore a muddied private's coat.

    The revolvers are absolutely gorgeous. But if was going to imagine something that "flashy" owned by a ACW General, my first instinct would be the "showman" J.E.B. Stuart.

    But that's just my take, not worth much. Just found them interesting when considered the type of man Grant was.
     

    Darkemp

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 18, 2009
    7,811
    Marylandistan
    This is a terribly interesting auction. I'll set the provenance aside (because it's simply awsome).

    Everything I read about Grant and seeing these revolvers almost seem a stark contrast from one another.

    Grant (aside from being probably the best General of the ACW) he was also very simple and sometimes elected the most basic of solutions to a problem. When West Point admissions got his name wrong on the rooster, he simply changed his name. Seige of Vicksburg was not terribly complicated, he remarked to "out-camp" the enemy. When he met Lee for terms of surrender, Lee put on his nicest uniform and Grant simply wore a muddied private's coat.

    The revolvers are absolutely gorgeous. But if was going to imagine something that "flashy" owned by a ACW General, my first instinct would be the "showman" J.E.B. Stuart.

    But that's just my take, not worth much. Just found them interesting when considered the type of man Grant was.

    Probably why they are still basically NIB- he probably never even fired them nor did anyone else from the looks. Too flashy for his tastes.
     

    eruby

    Confederate Jew
    MDS Supporter
    https://www.whiskey-lore.com/episodes/season-one/grant-lincoln-and-a-barrel-of-old-crow

    " ....Grants tactics came into question during the carnage at the Battle of Shiloh. It was a victory, but a costly one, and it was suggested that Grant may have been drinking during the heavy loss of life and that he should be removed. Lincoln was reported to say, "I can't spare this man, he fights!""


    If it's good enough for Grant, it's good enough for me. I have drunken worse whiskey. :innocent0


    3220898.jpg
     

    M1842

    Member
    Jul 27, 2009
    98
    This is a terribly interesting auction. I'll set the provenance aside (because it's simply awsome).

    Everything I read about Grant and seeing these revolvers almost seem a stark contrast from one another.

    Grant (aside from being probably the best General of the ACW) he was also very simple and sometimes elected the most basic of solutions to a problem. When West Point admissions got his name wrong on the rooster, he simply changed his name. Seige of Vicksburg was not terribly complicated, he remarked to "out-camp" the enemy. When he met Lee for terms of surrender, Lee put on his nicest uniform and Grant simply wore a muddied private's coat.

    The revolvers are absolutely gorgeous. But if was going to imagine something that "flashy" owned by a ACW General, my first instinct would be the "showman" J.E.B. Stuart.

    But that's just my take, not worth much. Just found them interesting when considered the type of man Grant was.

    As I recall, JEB Stuart carried LeMats as his favored sidearms.
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,090
    Wow.

    I was a little low with $3.275 million (post #25).


    Drum roll...


     

    mawkie

    C&R Whisperer
    Sep 28, 2007
    4,355
    Catonsville
    I wasn't even remotely close. Wondering what effect inflation has had. Is it taking just that much more in devalued $ to close the deal?
     
    Jul 1, 2012
    5,734
    $5.17M was the realized price, so hammer must have been $4.4M? that's 3/4 of a mil buyers premium at RIA's 17.5% ... but maybe they cut some slack over a certain amount. Then the state gov't has to get their bite. But I guess if you're forking out that kind of dough, it just doesn't matter :)
     

    Uncle Duke

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 2, 2013
    11,723
    Not Far Enough from the City
    $5.17M was the realized price, so hammer must have been $4.4M? that's 3/4 of a mil buyers premium at RIA's 17.5% ... but maybe they cut some slack over a certain amount. Then the state gov't has to get their bite. But I guess if you're forking out that kind of dough, it just doesn't matter :)
    Yes, 4.4 hammer. Willie and the poor boys......
     
    Jul 1, 2012
    5,734
    gotcha... so no break for the rich people on the buyer's premium :)
    I had heard that they do cut some slack on consignment fees but that may be a myth too...
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,527
    Messages
    7,285,108
    Members
    33,473
    Latest member
    Sarca

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom