E.Shell
Ultimate Member
FIFYThe M1 Carbine is not a weapon ofwaywhey. Duh.
FIFYThe M1 Carbine is not a weapon ofwaywhey. Duh.
It’s what we do. Capiche?This thread is drifting nicely.
Aren't Capiche Pants those ones that come down to a lady's calf? It's hard to keep track.Do you prefer your Capiche on the rocks or straight?
im buying the nicest M-1 Carbine with a folding stick money can buy as soon as this BS law goes away!!!!!
I am still running the words of the female judge through my mind… paraphrasing a little…
everyone buying a MSR is presumed to be a mass shooter as that’s the only thing these things are used for.
would/should someone hearing this case have recused/excused themselves if they start with this opinion?
The presence of politicians is what drives the corruption more than anything else.Even if that is the case, then if you flip it and the states with the highest convictions for public corruption have the lowest amount of it, it is still a mixed bag of states with little gun control, and those with onerous.
My point, and the state corruption index backs it up, there is no apparent correlation between public corruption and gun control. Gun control sometimes DOES result in public corruption. See all of the license to carry for money schemes that have been busted over the years. But legislating gun control in and of itself does not appear to have any link to the corruption going on in government otherwise.
...
Under MDAG's logic, I could be banned from possessing my restored 19th century percussion sidelock muskets because they're never used for self defense anymore.
As of mid-December, the “Appellate Court of Maryland.” Because renaming the courts was a high priority…..It really is the new Bruen standard. Just from reading what others have posted, it is hard to believe that one of the judges today could even fathom upholding the Maryland assault weapon ban under Bruen. However, the 4th Circuit actually upholding the new standard laid down by Bruen, which should have been the standard all the time, would really give the MGA pause. Then again, maybe not. Might as well spend more tax dollars employing more attorneys in the Maryland Attorney General's office to argue this tripe instead of actually accomplishing something of value.
Just so happy we have a Maryland Court of Special Appeals case confirming Bruen and Shall Issue.
Common use for specific models shouldn't even be a thing. Is it an arm useful in fighting tyranny? Great.
Wouldn't cheval de frise and caltrops be more effective against a cavalry charge?My Pattern 1853 Threeband Enfield Musket is in use right this minute, defending my home with 16" socket bayonet fixed.
Anybody attempts a cavalry charge on me is in for a surprise.
I’d figure a Maxim.Wouldn't cheval de frise and caltrops be more effective against a cavalry charge?
Wasn’t he also a felon in that case?? I need to look this one upJust doing some more thinking on something else here… the miller NFA case from ?38? Said arms useful for militia are protected. And found a sawed off shotgun not protected when the state alleged SOS was not commonly used by the military/militia.
how did this change to … it was useful for militia service being a disqualified as far as a type of firearm being 2a protected?
I prefer all the way off. Otherwise the situation gets awkward.Aren't Capiche Pants those ones that come down to a lady's calf? It's hard to keep track.