Scientists on the verge of PRINTING a handgun?!

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • smokey

    2A TEACHER
    Jan 31, 2008
    31,559
    Debate over this is stupid to me because intrinsic to the debate is the premise that a segment of our population isn't protected under the 2nd amendment. You're either a threat to society and shouldn't be in it, or you're not and should be part of society with all the rights inherent therein.

    That philosophical point aside, the laws preventing people from getting a firearm transferred to them through "normal" channels also prevent them from legally possessing them. If someone prohibited from obtaining a firearm wants one despite the law, they could either machine a gun(it's not hard...as once famously declared, your average technical tom could make a gun from loose parts in their garage, or from filipino curtain rods), steal a gun, or use someone to straw purchase them a gun. They're already breaking the law by possessing it, but they'd stop because of respect for transfer laws?

    If I have a cnc machine at home, how is "3d printing" very different from programming the cnc to make me a lower like I could now(assuming I had space and lots of money)? I also wonder if the people upset about this would be cool with me 3d printing a spear, knife, or club?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,845
    Messages
    7,298,141
    Members
    33,529
    Latest member
    roth405

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom