A motion of a temper tantrum, but how could this overturn the partial preliminary injunction????
The new laws are in effect EXCEPT for the 3 items listed in the PI. (The 10/2/23 defendants document was simply a clerical correction that “dwellings” is not included in the Order.)I'm confused now....
Explain in layman's terms!
Can we still CC like we did before October 1st or no and how will the defendants motion alter the partial PI?
These people sound like whiny 5 years olds that didn't get what they wanted.The State filed a motion today asserting the relief granted in the PI enjoining enforcement of restrictions on carry without the owner’s consent in private dwellings was error.
The State asserts the original PI order enjoined enforcement of the restrictions in both dwellings as well as buildings containing businesses open to the public, but neither Novotny nor Kipke challenged the restrictions on carry without consent in dwellings, thus plaintiffs are not entitled to this relief in the PI:
View attachment 433767 View attachment 433768 View attachment 433769
View attachment 433770
Which begs the question, why wasn't carry in private property not open to the public part of the PI request? And open carry? Seems like an unforced error, if you're asking for the cake back why would you not ask for ALL the cake? As it is we only got a couple of (medium sized) slices.Yes .
But alas in this narrow instance they are correct.
Seems like some of "our" folk want to seem reasonable instead of:
And by terrorists I mean WaldstreiKKKer, the Fresh Prince, Clippinger, etc.... All I've heard is that if we negotiate we can make this part of the law not so bad and keep the uninformed from getting jacked up. Meanwhile, the usual suspects are doubling down on pissing on the constitution and will fvck us any chance they get. The Fresh Prince's quotes on WMAL make it crystal clear where he stands.
No more, zip, zero, nada.
That's about right. The hypothetical involves going directly to the range with no detours.Taking a leap of assumption that said hypothetical person is going to/ from said Cindy Hot Shots , and doesn't have a W&C , and their route of travel only Includes B-W Parkway & rt 175 , tben probably not require locked case .
But yeah , I had to put enough caveats and assumptions into that statement .
So between now and December 31 , I'll be generous , and not accuse anyone of BGOS for transporting with locked case . Kind of a 90 day window for everyone to get up to speed , and learn all the sensitive boundaries .
Great idea!A dollar store luggage lock through the zipper tab of the gym bag and a sewn loop turns a gym bag or a pistol rug into a locked case.